Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 136 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [pdf, 391 KB]

   ...100 per cent reduction. Accordingly it was directed that a full Court hear the case. [12] There is a further matter relating to procedure to which it is necessary to make reference at this stage, concerning the nature of the challenge. The statement of claim stated that Think Steel’s election related to that part of the Authority’s determination which dealt with the remedies awarded and the quantum of those remedies; but it went on to state that a full hearing of those issue...

2. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

3. [2017] NZEnvC 090 Pierau v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act A PIERAU (ENV-2016-AKL-000174) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook Environment Commissioner D J Bunting Deputy Environment Commissioner R Bartlett at Auckland 29, 30, 31 March 2017 B Carrut

4. [2017] NZEnvC 090 Pierau v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act A PIERAU (ENV-2016-AKL-000174) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook Environment Commissioner D J Bunting Deputy Environment Commissioner R Bartlett at Auckland 29, 30, 31 March 2017 B Carrut

5. [2006] NZEmpC WC 10/06 Timmins v Asure New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...[3] In December 2004, Mr Timmins applied to the Employment Relations Authority for a compliance order and remedies for personal grievance. These proceedings have been removed by the Authority to the Court for hearing. [4] In an amended statement of problem he makes two general allegations: 1. That ASURE has refused to comply with the agreed terms of settlement following the mediation on 21 December 2001. He seeks an order that ASURE is to comply with the record of settlemen...

6. [2012] NZEmpC 215 NZ Language Centres Ltd (formerly GEOS NZ Ltd) v Page [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...then listed 12 matters on which Mr Maserow stated he would “like to hear your response”. [39] The 12 th matter was an allegation that a number of Mr Page’s colleagues had lost trust and confidence in him, and was supported by attached statements from those persons. The letter then stated: The company is concerned that the conduct … may constitute such gross underperformance and mismanagement so as to amount to serious misconduct. If I find that as a result of your a...

7. 3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part6.pdf [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...saying that “around 30” offenders received a third strike due to some uncertain es in the data (e.g. ongoing appeals). 2. The fact that this number of people ended up receiving a third strike does not by itself show a deterrent effect. To make this statement we would need to know how much of an impact, if any, the three strikes regime had on the general pa ern of declining reoffending over me as offenders ‘age out’ of criminality. This research would be complex and has not been underta...

8. OIA-120744.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...tailor them depending on what topics are raised on the day. This shows that we are genuinely listening and engaging in the process. 7. Roughly 80 other UN member states will ask New Zealand questions and make recommendations. However, all countries’ statements are pre-prepared, and we are not expected to answer any or all questions. We are expected to endeavour to address key topics raised in member states’ statements. 8. We suggest New Zealand’s two interventions consist of about three...

9. Pue v Kingi - Te Rununga o Ngati Maru (Taranaki) Whenua Topu Trust (2012) 291 Aotea MB 257 (291 AOT 257) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...is presently constituted, problematic, 4 Pue - Ngāti Maru Wharanui Pukehou Trust (2006) 166 Aotea MB 290 (166 AOT 290) 291 Aotea MB 263 [26] In a comparable context I note the following statements from a recent Court of Appeal judgment Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Tribal Trust v Karaka that are strikingly similar to the present and on-going challenges facing Ngāti Maru: 5 [8] To put the matters in issue in context, it is necessar...

10. CAC 20004 V Lindsay [2013] NZREADT 113 [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...he did not increase his offer to a higher sum when given the chance in competition with the defendant. He responded “I increased it to a level which I was comfortable with. I would never had paid $1 million for it”. The Evidence for the Defence The Defendant [25] Generally speaking, the defendant’s evidence was consistent with the facts outlined above. However in her evidence-in-chief she stated, inter alia, “I never had any discussions with Richard [Finn] about his budg...