Search Results

1. DU v UT [2025] NZDT 228 (8 July 2025) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. NF v B Ltd [2025] NZDT 227 (17 July 2025) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

3. Wellington Standards Committee v Nalder [2015] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...drawer to obtain a copy of a will of Mr Hancock, then one of Australia’s richest men in an attempt to obtain confidential information that he could then exploit for his own personal gain.1 [19] In this matter Ms Nalder has filed her own full affidavit completely accepting, from the outset, her fault in disclosing the document and stating what steps she had taken to make good this serious lapse in professional judgment. She immediately resigned her job and apologised to the testat...

4. Appellate judgments 2025

   ...related CA matter).SC in first recall, found no grounds for recusal, and regardless leave dismissed (no realistic prospects of success).Now H arguing remaining two judges should not have decided on alleged conflict without considering application to file affidavit.Held: No valid grounds for latest recallAppropriate for two panel judges to decide on recall (no conflicts) Affidavit evidence unnecessary as basis for recusal and case management functions clear from record. Registrar instructed not...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

5. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Slater [2019] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 717 KB]

   ...“everything”. Because Mr Slater has not in the past adhered to timetable directions and because the adjournment application was made in the last minute of the eleventh hour, such evidence as he files must be in the form of a sworn affidavit or affidavits. Hopefully this will reinforce the seriousness of the situation in which Mr Slater finds himself and the need for both the Director and the Tribunal to know that whatever Mr Slater’s final position is with regard to the evidence, h...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 124 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   QTN PLAN APPEALS – TOPIC 2 – INTERIM DECISION 2.9 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 124 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on

7. Waitangi Tribunal Guide to Practice 2023 [pdf, 900 KB]

   ...process.29 The Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson may determine the application, 26. The address for service on the Crown is : Treaty Team, Crown Law Office, PO Box 2858, Wellington 6140 ; email : treaty.teams@crownlaw.govt.nz. 27. Supporting affidavits are a means to put factual evidence before the Tribunal, not opin- ions or submissions. 28. As this is an interlocutory application usually heard on the papers, briefs of evidence will generally be inappropriate and counsel represent...

8. Hugh Grant Sayers - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...th.e/ frtj~t'h~~p.t~f and am' ~ut~9ri.sed ''~Y· tn~ th~irm~~ to _provide-th_is ·;~ffid~vit; My -evi(ience~is·,·of matters-.virt:l'ifo my · kr:owle'dge cir.JJ.¢rson~i 'experiehii-e!. ft~f~f to the furthifr affidavit ofloanriifNoble~ dateo 12:August:2ors; ·:Ms.NP-!ilrth\isJ~mti11tei1 subniissio.ns -madehy§/ip~dies:on,ad'iff'erenlst~tufory process' . -· -· •. . ., ._ ~ . . . - . :- '.{s.1-®li-·~pp,(it~t.r9nl9 Ministry of...

9. [2010] NZEmpc 98 Marshment v Sheppard Industries Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...contract is that much closer. It would be artificial, therefore, to freeze frame completely the relevant facts as at the date of the Authority’s investigation meeting, 28 June 2010. [5] This challenge has been determined on the basis of the affidavits that were before the Authority together with some brief updating evidence about relevant circumstances since the Authority’s investigation meeting in late June. That direction was made because, although a hearing by challenge d...

10. Reo v Reo - Whangaruru Whakaturia 1D9B1 (2015) 100 Taitokerau 156 (100 TTK 156) [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...th of August 2014. The minutes of that hearing are recorded at 86 Taitokerau MB 298 and following. On the 18 th of August, Ms Thomas, counsel for Mrs Wepiha Reo, filed a notice of intention to appear, a memorandum in support and an unsworn affidavit of Ms Wepiha Reo. In her memorandum, Ms Thomas summarises the position of the Beverley Desiree Whānau Trust. At paragraph 15 of her memorandum Ms Thomas explains that before the filing of the application, the whanau trust had bee...