Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 201 Auckland Council v Noe [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...remains in an un-remediated state. [9] I am conscious that Mr Noe has not commented on this application. Therefore in making this enforcement order I record that Mr Noe was served with a copy of this application by the Council as evidenced in an affidavit of service, and was given more than one opportunity to comment on the application before the Court. Mr Noe has chosen not to respond. [1 OJ I consider the fact that the enforcement order allows Mr Noe to adopt the method of remed...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 152 Airbnb Australia Pty Limited v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...accommodation in residential units. The proposed changes applied to both hosted and unhosted accommodation. [2] I have read and considered the consent memoranda of the parties dated 26 April 2023 and 30 June 2023. I have also read and considered the affidavit of Mr Ian Bayliss1 filed in support of the proposed resolution of this appeal. [3] The agreement reached involves various amendments to the wording of the plan change provisions in Chapters 12 Papakāinga/Kāinga Nohoanga Zo...

3. Ngā Mātāpono – The Principles: The Interim Report of the Tomokia Ngā Tatau o Matangireia – The Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry Panel on the Crown’s Treaty Principles Bill and Treaty Clause Review Policies [pdf, 6.4 MB]

   ...Cabinet paper and regulatory impact statement. These were to be filed on 9 July 2024.31 The claimants and inter- ested parties were directed to file reply submissions on 15 July 2024.32 On 9 July 2024, the Crown filed its closing submissions and an affidavit of Rajesh Chhana responding to the Tribunal’s question.33 Mr Chhana stated that it was not possible to say when Cabinet would consider the Cabinet paper as minis- terial consultation on the draft paper was ongoing.34 He stated further...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 143 Borsboom (Labour Inspector) v Preet PVT Ltd [pdf, 667 KB]

   ...as to its interpretation and operation, albeit in the form of observations or commentary. [7] We begin the judgment of this case by setting out relevant facts. These were either found by the Authority or not contested when placed before it in affidavits filed by the plaintiff. The following not only describes the breaches by the defendants of three employment statutes, but goes into sufficient detail of these as is necessary to make an assessment of the seriousness of those breach...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 189 Gisborne District Council v China Forestry Group New Zealand Company [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...off-site impacts of forestry slash including from legacy harvest operations Legacy [52] There is a substantial legacy issue to be dealt with in Tairāwhiti. There is frequent mobilisation of forestry slash with large volumes now deposited in 11 First affidavit of J Botes, 4 Septemebr 2023 at [58]. 19 streams and making its way to the coastal environment. In some locations such as the Mangatokerau Road in the Waimatā catchment estimates of residual material are in the hundre...

6. Covid-Priority.docx [docx, 6.5 MB]

   ...of claims would not be registered as claimants for the purposes of the priority inquiry.[footnoteRef:16] [14: Submission 3.2.441, p 1.] [15: Memorandum 2.6.77, p 3.] [16: Memorandum 2.6.77, p 4.] Before the hearing started, the Crown filed an affidavit from the Minister of covid-19 Response, the Honourable Chris Hipkins. The Crown advised that Minister Hipkins was unable to attend the hearing to present this evidence. Consequently, Judge Stone directed parties to file, in writing, any qu...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   W h a i a t e M a n a M o t u h a k e i n P u r s u i t o f M a n a M o t u h a k e Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W a i 2 4

8. Mr-Rasheeds-Authorities.pdf [pdf, 7.1 MB]

   AUTHORITIES 1 Jordan v United Kingdom [2001] ECHR 327. 2 Osman v the United Kingdom [1998] ECHR 101 3 R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner [2004] 2 AC 182. 4 Sarjantson v Humberside Police Chief Constable [2013] EWCA Civ 125 5 Wallace v Attorney General [2021] NZCA 506 6 Anjum Rahman, Aliya Danzeisen, Maysoon Salama. (2019). Submissions of IWCNZ to Royal Commission of Inquiry. [online]. Available at: https://islamicwomenscouncilnz.co.nz/submissions-iwcnz/ [Accessed 25 Jan. 2022] 7 Royal

9. Nukutere Lands Trust v Trustees of Whitikau A1 – Opape 28 (2013) 70 Waiariki MB 272 (70 WAR 272) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   70 Waiariki MB 272 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20030002687 A20050004880 A20050008626 UNDER Sections 9 and 326B, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Opape 28 (Whitikau A1) - Land Access BETWEEN NUKUTERE LANDS TRUST Applicant AND TRUSTEES OF WHITIKAU A1 First Respondent AND CJ PARKINSON Second Respondent Hearing: 24 March 2003, 81 Ōpōtiki MB 139-140 29 May 2003, 81 Ō

10. Research report: Without notice applications in the Family Court [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...the public counter here, one of the things the staff will give them is the proper forms, if they don’t have them. Explain that it needs to be sworn or affirmed, and anything they want to attach to it needs to be annexed correctly as part of the affidavit swearing process. One of the things we must say to them is there are two ways you can do it – you can do it without notice or you can do it on notice. So on notice is normal and you have to attend FDR, and without notice is urgent...