Search Results

1. [2024] NZLVT 019 - Burney v Christchurch City Council (18 April 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...claimed or awarded as compensation, or, as the case may be, the amount of the purchase money, rent, or other consideration for which the consent of the Tribunal is applied for or granted, or the value of the land in respect of which the objection or appeal was made. [6] In exercising my discretion under s34 of the LVPA, I consider that there is good reason to prohibit the publication and/or distribution of the affirmation of Mr Sharlick on the grounds it holds information that is...

2. [2024] NZLVT 037 - Scott v Hastings District Council (1 July 2024) [pdf, 276 KB]

   Scott v Hastings District Council IN THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL AT AUCKLAND I TE TARAIPŪNARA WĀRIU WHENUA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZLVT 037 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 36 of the Rating Valuations Act 1998 BETWEEN CATHERINE SCOTT (ENV-2023-AKL-000189) Objector AND HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Tribunal: Judge M J L Dickey, Chairperson Date of Decision: 1 July 2024 Date of Issue: 1 July 2024 DETERMINATION OF THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNA...

3. [2024] NZLVT 001- Frazer v Wellington City Council (24 January 2024) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...The onus of proof on the objection lay on Mr Gilbert as the objector. The initial revaluation signed by a registered valuer in the name of the Valuer- General was presumptively correct. Mr Gilbert - both before the Tribunal, and before this Court on appeal - had the affirmative burden. It was not enough for Mr Gilbert - through Mr Robinson - to show that the scales were even at the end of the hearing. He had to show that the Valuer-General was wrong. [8] In this case, the parties have...

4. [2025] NZLVT 11 - Schnauer v Thames Coromandel District Council (19 March 2025) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...onus of proof on the objection lay on Mr Gilbert as the objector. The initial revaluation signed by a registered valuer in the name of the Valuer- General was presumptively correct. Mr Gilbert – both before the Tribunal, and before this Court on appeal – had the affirmative burden. It was not enough for Mr Gilbert – through Mr Robinson – to show that the scales were even at the end of the hearing. He had to show that the Valuer-General was wrong. In this case, the parties ha...

5. [2025] NZLVT 031 - Mursell v Wellington City Council (2 July 2025) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...The onus of proof on the objection lay on Mr Gilbert as the objector. The initial revaluation signed by a registered valuer in the name of the Valuer- General was presumptively correct. Mr Gilbert - both before the Tribunal, and before this Court on appeal - had the affirmative burden. It was not enough for Mr Gilbert - through Mr Robinson - to show that the scales were even at the end of the hearing. He had to show that the Valuer-General was wrong. [8] In this case, the parties have...

6. [2025] NZEmpC 155 Manuka Health New Zealand Ltd v Kalic [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...was granted to Manuka Health New Zealand Ltd.1 The company challenged a determination of the Employment Relations Authority where Mr Kalic succeeded in his claim for an unjustified disadvantage.2 The stay was sought to preserve the company’s appeal rights while it pursued an application to reopen the investigation in the Authority. 1 Manuka Health New Zealand Ltd v Kalic [2024] NZEmpC 78. 2 Kalic v Health New Zealand Ltd [2024] NZERA 107. [2] The challenge was confi...

7. Make a complaint about a legal aid lawyer

   ...the complaint should be substantiated or not substantiated. If a complaint is substantiated, the consequences for the lawyer will depend on the seriousness of the complaint. A complaint investigation cannot make findings related to individual cases, appeal proceedings or prison sentences. Find out more about the complaints management process and investigation stages in the complaints management policy Complaints to the New Zealand Law Society You can also complain to the New Zealand Law Society...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Legal aid >
   4. Your legal aid

8. ENV-2020-AKL-000084

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000084 Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited CNI Iwi Land Management Limited Dairy NZ Limited Director-General of Conservation Federated Farmers of New Zealand G Pinnell Graeme Gleeson Hamilton City Council Hancock Forest Management (NZ) Limited Horticulture New Zealand Lochiel Farmlands Limited Matamata-Piako District Council Mercury NZ Limited Miraka Limited...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

9. ENV-2020-AKL-000096

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000096 Director-General of Conservation v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Bathurst and BT Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Contact Energy Limited Dairy NZ Limited Federated Farmers of New Zealand Genesis Energy Limited Genetic Technologies Limited G Pinnell Graeme Gleeson Hamilton City Council Hancock Forest Management (NZ) Limited Horticulture New Zealand King Country Energy Limited - Interest withdrawn 22/01/2021 Lochiel Farmlands Limited Matamata-Piako D...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

10. About the Tribunal

    ...Assessment Committee (a Committee) of the Real Estate Authority (the Authority). The Tribunal also hears and determines applications for a real estate agent’s or agency’s licence to be suspended until the charges have been heard.  It also deals with appeals against a committee’s decisions and reviews the decisions of the Registrar not to grant or renew a real estate licence.  Powers of the tribunal If the Tribunal finds a licensee guilty of misconduct it can make any of the...

    Located in:

    1. Tribunals >
    2. Real estate agents