Search Results

1. Beatson v CAC 416, Cripsin, Mordaunt & Property Brokers Ltd [2019] NZREADT 25 (9 July 2019) [pdf, 521 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 25 READT 003/19 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN BARRY BUSTER BEATSON Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First respondent AND JAMES CRISPIN, TIM MORDAUNT & PROPERTY BROKERS LTD Second respondents Hearing: 15 May 2019 Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms...

2. ACA Application for Leave to Appeal [pdf, 274 KB]

   For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals Accident Compensation Appeals District Court Registry UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ApplIcANT (name of party seeking to appeal) AND REspONDENT (name of other party) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribuna...

3. Use a representative

   Anyone appealing to the tribunal may appoint a representative to represent them during the appeal process, or they may represent themselves. A representative may include a family member or friend. There are strict rules about who can be appointed to act as your representative. They must be a licensed immigration advisor, a lawyer or someone who is exempt from having a licence. If you wish to have a representative, you and the representative need to fill in this form: Authority to act - Form 8 Th...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Immigration >
   3. Immigration & Protection Tribunal >
   4. Make an appeal

4. 2017 NZSSAA 011 (31 March 2017) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Social Development: J Hume For the Appellant: The appellant in person G Howell, representative INTERIM DECISION Background [1] At the hearing on 17 March 2017 the subject of this appeal was disputed by the parties. Ms XXXX says that she appeals all decisions made by the Ministry since 1998. [2] The Ministry submit that the appeal is limited to the calculation of debt incurred by Ms XXXX since 2008. [3] We have determined the extent of the appeal as a preliminary issue...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 033 Burkhart Fisheries Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 33 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BURKHART FISHERIES LIMITED (ENV-2017-CHC-67) Appellant MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 19 March 2018 Date of Issue: 19 March 2018 DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR WAI...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 023 Zindia Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 23 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN ZINDIA LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-178) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan 1 Hearing: at Blenheim on 17 December 2018 Appearances: Q A M Davies for the appellant A C Besier for the respondent Date of Decision: 17 December 20...

7. South Waikato District Council.pdf [pdf, 229 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV-2020-AKL-000100 AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan BETWEEN WAIKATO RAUPATU RIVER TRUST, RAUKAWA CHARITABLE TRUST, TE ARAWA RIVER IWI TRUST, TŪWHARETOA MĀORI TRUS...

8. Appellate judgments 2023

   Court of Appeal [2023] NZCA 631 Temple and Ors v Pilgrim and OrsAPPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – proposed grounds do not merit leave – parties are invited to give submissions on other grounds. [2023] NZCA 611 Halse v Employment Relations AuthorityAPPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – no seriously arguable question of law or general or public importance – application declined. [2023] NZCA 512 Bowen v Bank of New ZealandAPPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL – no seriously arguable question of law...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

9. [2017] NZEnvC 190 Hood v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 190 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN KAND S HOOD (ENV-2017 -CHC-003) Appellants AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Hearing : at Dunedin on 13 and 14 November 2017 Appearances: C Thomsen for the appellants R Brooking for the respondent D McLachlan and B Irving for the appl...

10. Rattray v Denbigh LCRO 211 / 2009 (16 December 2009) [pdf, 42 KB]

    ...the fee required to accompany an application for review is $30. Section 198(c) is clear in stating that an application must be “be accompanied by the prescribed fee (if any)”. [4] The failure to pay a prescribed fee for the bringing of an appeal (or other application that a decision be reviewed) will be fatal to an application. This will be the case even where the fee is subsequently paid. In Cahayag v Removal Review Authority [1998] 2 NZLR 72; [1998] NZAR 145 a notice of appea...