Search Results

1. GL & VL v W Ltd [2025] NZDT 114 (11 February 2025) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

2. UN v IH [2025] NZDT 95 (12 May 2025) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

3. KQ & QQ v R Ltd [2025] NZDT 183 (6 June 2025) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

4. N Ltd v LX [2025] NZDT 204 (12 May 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

5. LD v BK [2025] NZDT 257 (15 July 2025) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accept...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 280 Horongarara Point Group v Waikato District Council [pdf, 735 KB]

   Horongarara Point Group v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 280 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN HORONGARARA POINT GROUP (ENV-2022-AKL-065) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Section 274 party Court: Environment Judge S M Tepania sitting...

7. Complaints, objections & appeals

   How you can complain about a private security operator, object to people applying to work in this area, and appeal decisions. Complaints How to complain about a private security operator, and what you can complain about. Complaints Objections to applications  How to object to applications for private security licences and what the grounds for an objection are. Objections to applications Appeal a decision How Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority (PSPLA) decisions can be appeale...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Licences & certificates >
   3. Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority

8. [2020] NZREADT 42 - Stone v The Real Estate Agents Authority (14 September 2020) [pdf, 356 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 42 READT 033/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GARY STONE Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 412) First Respondent AND SUSAN LIM Second Respondent (Not participating in the appeal) Hearing: 31 July 2020 Tribunal: Mr J Doogue, Deputy Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O...

9. Wilson v CAC 10011 & McPherson, Nottingham & McKinney [2012] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 37 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2012] NZREADT 51 Reference No: READT 058/11 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN WARREN WILSON Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC10011) First Respondent AND D McPHERSON, P & D NOTTINGHAM AND E McKINNEY Second Respondents BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport - Chairperson...

10. [2016] NZCA 54 CA427/2015 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Limited [pdf, 149 KB]

    SCARBOROUGH v MICRON SECURITY PRODUCTS LIMITED [2016] NZCA 54 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA427/2015 [2016] NZCA 54 BETWEEN YASODHARA DA SILVEIRA SCARBOROUGH Applicant AND MICRON SECURITY PRODUCTS LIMITED Respondent CA578/2015 BETWEEN YASODHARA DA SILVEIRA SCARBOROUGH Applicant AND MICRON SECURITY PRODUCTS LIMITED Respondent Court: Stevens, Cooper and Kós JJ Counsel: Applican...