14969 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 181 ACR 52/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN SOSAIA TONGA Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION First Respondent AND ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Second Respondent Appearances: Mr A Beck for the Applicant Mr C Hlavac for the First Respondent Mr P Winter fo...
[2017] NZSSAA 061 Reference No. SSA 109/16 and SSA 177/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Cambridge against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member Hearing at Tauranga on 12 July 2017 Appearances The appellant in person Iris Ji as agent of the Chief Executive DECISION Background [1] XXX...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC l05 of the Heritage NZ Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal pursuant to s58 of the Act NGATI PUKENGA Kl PAKIKAIKUTU AND PAKIKAIKUTU 2C2W PAPAKAINGA TRUST (ENV-2018-AKL-000339) Appellants HERITAGE NZ POUHERE TAONGA Respondent JACQUELINE SCOTT Applicant Environment Judge MJL Dickey Environme...
On this page: Defending a general civil proceeding – someone wants to recover money or settle a dispute Defending an originating application Defending an appeal – someone has asked a District Court to reconsider a Judge’s decision Opposing an application for a restraining order Opposing an interlocutory application – someone has applied for directions or orders secondary to the main claim Setting aside or varying a judgment by default Defending a general civil proceeding – someone w...
Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land...
Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land...
...AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND ENV·2016·AKL·000221 of the Local Govemment (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal pursuant to section 156 of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel ("Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Plan&...
...COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV-2016-AKL-000245 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal pursuant to section 156 of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel ("Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Plan&q...
...COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV·2016·AKL·000208 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") of an appeal pursuant to section 156 of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel ("Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Pla...
...which needs to be taken as to the merits of the claims of the party seeking exercise of the discretion to extend time, in these paragraphs: [36] The first point we make is that in most civil cases in New Zealand there is a right to a first appeal. The Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules do not confer an explicit power on the Court of Appeal to strike out timely appeals summarily on their merits (although they do contemplate appeals being struck for non-payment of security for costs or...