Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 068 University of Otago v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 639 KB]

   ...affidavit of Peter Benjamin Rawson, affirmed 21 April 2022. [3] The court will only make orders if it is satisfied it is appropriate to do so and where there is no relationship between the provisions proposed to be amended by consent order and other appeals before the court. [4] Mr Rawson has satisfied me that the amendments sought are appropriate and consistent with achieving the relevant objectives of the 2GP. Mr Rawson says that follo~ving these amendments the 2GP "\vill c...

2. [2024] NZEmpC 14 Pretorius v Board of Trustees of Taupo Intermediate School [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...has been filed, but I note that in the security for costs application I found that it was probable that the plaintiff would not be able to comply with any significant adverse costs award.3 The plaintiff has also filed an application for leave to appeal the interlocutory judgment that underlies this application for costs. [4] The Court has a discretion as to costs.4 As the defendant was successful in relation to the interlocutory issues, it is entitled to costs. The plaintiff raise...

3. Brown v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on Appeal) [2024] NZACC 085 [pdf, 146 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 085 ACR 110/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN PAUL BROWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: K Koloni for the Appellant F Becroft for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment...

4. N Ltd v TT [2023] NZDT 224 (16 May 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...finally determined against him or her in the original proceeding. 4. It is well established in New Zealand law that parties cannot re-litigate questions that have already been judicially determined. Authority for this can be found in the Court of Appeal decision of Shiels v Blakeley [1986] 2 NZLR 262 (at 266) where the Court stated: Where a final decision has been pronounced by a New Zealand judicial tribunal of jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject-matter of the litig...

5. Pirika v Eru - Te Ngae Farm Trust [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 285 (2013 APPEAL 285) [pdf, 104 KB]

   2013 Maori Appellate Court MB 285 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20120013572 APPEAL 2012/12 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 8 October 2012 at 62 Waiariki MB 92 in respect of Te Ngae Farm Trust BETWEEN ARAMAKARAKA PIRIKA, HIWINUI HEKE, PIRIHIRA FENWICK AND WHARANGI WAETFORD Appellants AND TAI ERU AND RANGIMAHUTA EASTHOPE Res...

6. Chief Justice Media Statement COVID-19 Alert Levels 3 and 4 21 08 27 [pdf, 533 KB]

   ...participation, as outlined in the court’s operating protocol for Alert Level 3 and 4. Criminal Other than jury trials, the High Court will continue to deal with criminal matters by remote means. This includes first appearances, bail applications and appeals, custodial remands, conviction and sentence appeals, case review hearings, sentence indications, pre-trial matters and sentencings. Civil Substantive civil fixtures involving witnesses with upcoming hearing dates will be reviewed...

7. [2021] NZSSAA 3 (2 March 2021) [pdf, 134 KB]

   [2021] NZSSAA 3 Reference No. SSA 92/2019 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair J Ryall - Member Hearing at AUCKLAND on 9 January 2021 Appearances The appellant in person R Stainthorpe, counsel, and I Ji, appeals office...

8. [2016] NZSSAA 002 (12 February 2016) [pdf, 31 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 002 Reference No. SSA 098/15 & 099/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Lower Hutt against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at WELLINGTON on 10 November 2015 APPEARANCES Mr G Howell for appellant Ms S Singh for Chief Executive of th...

9. WHT Annual Report 2019 [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...enforced as orders of the District Court.7 The claims presently before the Tribunal range in value from about $217,000 to $10.3 million. They concern stand-alone houses, townhouses and apartments. The Tribunal has cases throughout New Zealand. Appeals A party to a claim determined by the Tribunal may appeal on a question of law or fact arising out of the decision.8 The appeal will be heard by the District Court if the amount does not exceed $350,000, otherwise it will be hear...

10. [2018] NZSSAA 56 (31 October 2018) [pdf, 133 KB]

    [2018] NZSSAA 56 Reference No. SSA 057/18 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX, against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at Wellington on 28 September 2018 Appearances For the Appellant: Mr N Ellis (agent), with the appellant. For Chief Executive of the...