Search Results

1. KN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover and Suspension of Entitlements) [2025] NZACC 24 (12 February 2025) [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 024 ACAR 116/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 4 December 2024 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: B Hinchcliff for the Appellant F...

2. Holmes v Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...of any person involved in these proceedings. The interim order made at the commencement of the hearing on 1 December 2011 is accordingly at an end. That interim order was made to protect the confidentiality of a decision of the Social Security Appeal Authority received in evidence. We have not found it necessary to refer to that decision with the result that it does not require protection in these proceedings additional to that which it enjoys under the Social Security Act 1964. [4]...

3. LCRO 196/2020 AB v CD (31 March 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] to take no further action in respect of her complaints concerning the conduct of the respondent, Mr CD. Background [2] Ms AB instructed Mr CD to represent her in High Court and Court of Appeal proceedings. [3] Those proceedings related to issues concerning an easement over a property owned by the [123] trust. Ms AB was a trustee of the trust. 2 [4] Mr CD undertook work for Ms AB, from January 2019 to the end of Dece...

4. [2012] NZSC 8 CA124/2011 Service and Food Workers Union & Ors v OCS Limited [pdf, 10 KB]

   ...Respondent Court: Elias CJ, Blanchard and William Young JJ Counsel: P Cranney and A J Connor for First and Second Appellants P A McBride and G A Ballara for Respondent Judgment: 28 February 2012 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A Leave to appeal is granted. B The approved questions are whether, and if so to what extent, the multi-employer collective employment agreement precludes the second appellants from bargaining for redundancy entitlements under s 69N of the...

5. Serving documents

   ...given to the other party in the proceeding. Generally, it is the prosecutor’s responsibility to serve their documents on you, and it is your responsibility to serve your documents on the prosecutor. A Registrar is responsible for serving any notice of appeal or notice of application for leave to appeal. You can serve documents by: giving it to the other party (prosecutor); posting it to their address for service or by leaving it at that address between 9am and 5pm; any other method that the...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a criminal case in the High Court

6. How you can represent yourself in a criminal proceeding

   ...order (under section 68 of the Act) for your proceeding to be tried in the High Court you have been charged with a category 2 or 3 offence and a High Court judge has made an order (under section 70 of the Act) that you be tried in the High Court you are appealing a decision made by a District Court judge or you have gained leave to appeal a decision of a community magistrate

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a criminal case in the High Court

7. Brightwell - Estate of Roera Rangi or Rangi Roera or Roera Te Heke-tanga [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1457 [pdf, 607 KB]

   ...would be well worth a case submitted for the opinion of the Supreme Court. 10. On 1 June 1905, the Court heard an application for Probate in respect of Roera Rangi., however the application was adjourned to await the result of appeals against the succession. 11. The first of the orders complained of, 10 Taranaki MB 138 – 156 (12 & 13 October 1906) doesn’t contain any Court orders, rather these minutes represent evidence presented to the Court...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 46 Rush Security Services Ltd v Samoa [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...order that Rush Security Services Ltd is to reimburse Mr Samoa in the sum of $70 for the filing fee which he paid in bringing his proceedings to the Authority. [2] Since that determination on 14 October 2010, Rush Security Services Ltd has appealed against the determination by way of a challenge non de novo in this Court and the statement of claim specifies the areas of dispute to the determination. Rush Security Services Ltd has now brought to this Court an application for stay...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 65 Zhou v Chief Executive of the Department of Labour [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...this information, that is of the specific instances of disclosure, and why these were “unauthorised”. [6] As noted in the second interlocutory judgment of 15 April 2011, the Court has been guided significantly by the judgments of the Court of Appeal in the Choudry litigation 2 referred to in that judgment. It is also appropriate to recall the nature of the present litigation and what must be established and by whom. The plaintiff says that he was dismissed unjustifiably fr...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 162 Ong & Ong trading as Pharmacy 72 v Massie [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...They also claimed to have received a “threatening letter” from Mr Tee that if they proceeded with the Court hearing, his costs would be in the vicinity of $20,000. They claimed that it was on the advice of the Chief of the Authority that they appealed to the Employment Court but that in the circumstances set out above they dared not proceed with the Court hearing. [8] Whilst the defendant’s memorandum gives no details of the costs incurred, I am required by the Court of Appe...