Search Results

1. MJ v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 220 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 220 ACR 62/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MJ Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 14 December 2023 Held at: Wellington by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented R...

2. Jessup v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2022] NZACC 218 [pdf, 215 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 218 ACR 52/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOSEPH JESSUP Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 17 November 2022 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: P Schmidt for the Appellant S Bisley for the respondent Judgment: 25 N...

3. Tutt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed Cover) [2023] NZACC 72 [pdf, 274 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 72 ACR 44/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANDREW TUTT Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 24 March 2023 Heard at: Auckland / Tamaki Makaurau Appearances: Mr B Hinchcliff for the Appellant Mr F Becroft for the Respondent Judgment: 11 May...

4. National Standards Committee 2 v Mr Q [2023] NZLCDT 14 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...directly to the Tribunal from the Standards Committee. The Standards Committee found all the conduct to be unsatisfactory conduct and fined Mr Q, censuring him and ordering him to pay compensation to the two victims. The New Zealand Law Society appealed to the Legal Complaints Review Officer who directed the Standards Committee to reconsider. [11] Despite factual differences, the decisions of the Tribunal and the High Court in Gardner-Hopkins1 are pertinent to this case. So are the...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 281 Save The Maitai Incorporated v Nelson City Council [pdf, 294 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 281 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act and Private Plan Change 28 to the Nelson Resource Management Plan BETWEEN SAVE THE MAITAI INCORPORATED (ENV-2022-CHC-65) Appellant AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL Respondent AND CCKV MAITAI DEV CO LP & BAYVIEW NELSON LIMITED Applicant Court: E...

6. LCRO 157/2024 TA v YQ (25 June 2025) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...the deed contained a cross-reference to clause 7.2 which, in context, appeared to be an error. The Family Court Judge found that the reference to clause 7.2 “…was a clerical error and it should read 9.2.”5 [29] The brother unsuccessfully appealed the Family Court’s main decision. He apparently also applied unsuccessfully to the High Court to recall the probate granted of Mr X’s will. [30] In total, the respondent’s firm charged the estate about $84,000 in legal fee...

7. BZ v Accident Compensation Corporation (Mental Injury) [2025] NZACC 065 (22 April 2025) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 065 ACAR 82/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN BZ Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 April 2025 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriro District Court Appearances: R Johnston for the Appellan...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 172 Aviation & Marine Engineers Assn Inc v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 601 KB]

   ...is inconsistent with what is expressly recorded in the collective agreement. [69] In the field of employment law, the interpretation of collective agreements has been addressed most authoritatively and recently in the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Silver Fern Farms Ltd v New Zealand Meatworkers and Related Trades Union Inc. 6 The Court of Appeal followed the judgments of the Supreme Court in Vector Gas and what it described as a series of important decisions of the House of...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 217 Dixon v Invercargill City Council [pdf, 702 KB]

   Dixon & Others v ICC – INTERIM DECISION BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 217 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act in relation to the Proposed Invercargill District Plan BETWEEN THOMAS ANDREW DIXON, DOUGLAS STANLEY MUNRO AND R MUNRO, JOHN DAVID SCOTT AND OAKLAND FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2016-CHC-097) GREGORY SIMMONS (ENV-2016-CHC-101)...

10. 1.-Lonnie-Dalzell-Owner-Interface-Manager.pdf [pdf, 400 KB]

    ...delivered. 11. Since the formation of the Alliance I have worked as the Transport Agency’s ‘Owner Interface Manager’ within the Alliance. The key tasks for the Alliance 1 As the Court is aware, the appeals against that decision have been resolved by consent on the basis of amended conditions and a shift in the alignment of the Project (the "Northern Alignment"). The Environment Court granted the consent order of the partie...