Hallett v Te Moana - Estate of Sheryl Marie Te Moana (2019) 399 Aotea MB 138 (399 AOT 138) [pdf, 297 KB]
...succeed to Ms Te Moana on intestacy would be her siblings, given she did not have children. [15] However, as foreshadowed, the position of Ms Hallett must also be considered in the context of s 116 of the Act and the provisions of the Family Protection Act 1955. Is Ms Hallett entitled to an order per s 116 of the Act? [16] Section 116 of the Act provides: 116 Court may make special provision relating to income (1) Subject to subsection (2), in the exercise of its powers under...