Search Results

1. ENV-2016-AKL-000192 Kiwi Property Group Limited & Kiwi Property Holdings Limited v Auckland Council (Transport) [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY ENV-2016-AKL- IN THE MATTER of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 ("LGATPA") and the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearing Panel ("Hearing Panel") on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan ("Proposed Plan

2. IO v SJ LCRO 84 / 2010 (1 February 2012) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...funds to the Practitioner’s mismanagement of trust property. [23] There are clear rules surrounding conflict which lawyers are bound to observe in their professional practice (broadly stated in Chapter 6 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care), and lawyers must avoid acting in situations involving a conflict of interest. A conflict may arise in a number of different situations and circumstances, including where the interests of the Practitioner may conflict with those of the cl...

3. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v O'Boyle [2021] NZLCDT 27 (29 October 2021) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...interest (which include “protection of the public”), to maintain professional standards, to impose sanctions on a practitioner for breach of his/her duties, and to provide scope for rehabilitation in appropriate cases. Tribunals are required to carefully consider alternatives to striking off a practitioner. If the purposes of imposing disciplinary sanctions can be achieved short of striking off then it is the lesser alternative that should be adopted as the proportionate response. Tha...

4. [2024] NZIACDT 03 – MT v Murthy (11 January 2024) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...from Australia. He was subsequently issued with a work visa, having again failed to declare his criminal history. When Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) found out, he was issued with a deportation order. An appeal to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal failed.1 He left New Zealand in 2015. [6] On 1 June 2021, the complainant and the client, together with Ms Murthy, signed the immigration company’s service contract. Ms Murthy agreed to seek a partnership visa, inc...

5. Pilbrow & Anor as Trustees of the Pilbrow Family Trust v Moorhead [2011] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...of Mr Craven and CBL. [43] The identification of defects in construction and design is a separate issue from determining whether a particular party is liable for the defects identified – and the extent to which any breach of a duty of care caused damage. Page | 13 Principal Defect 1 - Lack of internal corner flashings to harditex at fire wall and barge areas [44] Harditex was used on the party wall between 51 and 53 Kulim Avenue and at the barge areas. The p...

6. Directory of Official Information 2019 P-R [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings P-R About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz

7. VU v AP LCRO 277/2011 (5 June 2013) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...the matter had not been looked at. His complaint was that Mr AP had acted on behalf of himself and his wife without their authority or knowledge, and there was also the concern that Mr AP had breached Rule 11.1 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care.1 [7] Rule 11 deals with proper professional practice. Rule 11.1 states that a lawyer must not engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive anyone on any aspect of the lawyer’s practice. [8...

8. Lomu v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 42 (31 March 2014) [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...immigration services. [5] The statement of complaint identifies the potential grounds for upholding the complaint, with particulars. The key elements and particulars being: [5.1] A breach of clause 1.1 of the Code of Conduct – obligations relating to care diligence and respect. The particulars are: [5.1.1] The Adviser had instructions to apply for a visa on 4 January 2011, but did not lodge the application. [5.1.2] When her licence expired on 23 September 2011, she had not lodged t...

9. 30-June-Legal-Aid-News.pdf [pdf, 596 KB]

   ...fee schedules between 21 November to 19 December 2015. New fees have been added to the Children & Young Persons fixed fee schedule to accommodate:  a new type of guardianship order (special guardianship) for children leaving state funded care  a new care and protection ground for where the child's parent has previously had a child or young person removed due to abuse or neglect (Subsequent Children)  a new ability for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social D...

10. Family Court Lay Advocates

    What a Family Court Lay Advocate does Lay Advocates appear in the Family Court in support of a child or young person who is the subject of care and protection proceedings under the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989. As a statutory appointment, Lay Advocates are not employed by, or contracted to, the Ministry of Justice or the Court. Lay Advocates are independent service providers and are not covered by the Employment Relations Act 2000. Appointment of Family Court Lay Advocates From time to time, a...

    Located in:

    1. About >
    2. Lawyers & service providers >
    3. Service providers