Search Results

1. KXBK v GVH [2019] NZIACDT 74 (1 November 2019) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...Advisers Authority (the Authority) notified the adviser of the complaint. [2] It is alleged that the adviser was negligent or breached the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014 (the Code) by failing to exercise diligence and due care, since he filed an application which had little hope of success. Furthermore, he acted unprofessionally in offering to refund his fee if the complaint was withdrawn. [3] The essential issue to consider is whether, despite mistakes by the...

2. LCRO 95/2024 HC v RB (30 July 2025) [pdf, 428 KB]

   ...respondent referred to unauthorised withdrawals of between $250,000 and $300,000 and the likelihood of other unauthorised withdrawals in previous years. He recorded that his primary reason for not agreeing to retire as trustee was the need “to protect the girls in particular from these unauthorised withdrawals on the Trusts’ fund” and commented on the applicant’s perceived intention to replace him with “a person who will be more pliant to her wishes and in effect give her free...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...incur a warning in respect of an offence if the supervisor decides that formal disciplinary action is required. … v) Failure to follow the reasonable instruction of a supervisor or other authorised agent of the employer. … ix) Personal protective equipment (PPE) is provided for the safety and wellbeing of all employees. Failure to use or wear agreed PPE as instructed is foolhardy and unacceptable. [12] Then cl 31 deals with warnings for misconduct “outside that which...

4. Mohammadalibeigy v Yap [2015] NZIACDT 64 (25 May 2015) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. [8] When imposing sanctions those statutory purposes require consideration of at least four factors which may materially bear upon maintaining appropriate standards of conduct: [8.1] Protecting the public: Section 3 of the Act states “The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers receiving immigration advice ...” [8.2] Demanding minimum standards of conduct: Dentice v Valuers Registration...

5. Carley (INZ) v Kim [2015] NZIACDT 107 (22 December 2015) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...[16.7] Costs. [17] However, the Tribunal has taken a very flexible approach where complaints arise out of a licensed immigration adviser’s lack of awareness, and provided opportunities for restoration to practising. None-the-less, the consumer protection afforded by the Act is always an important factor. [18] In this case, I approach the matter on the basis Ms Kim does not comprehend the issues. Serious as the matters are, they appear to result from ignorance and gross incompetence r...

6. LCDT - 2013 annual report [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...public become increasingly aware of their rights and the Law Society’s own processes continue to identify issues of concern. The focus of the Tribunal now will be to ensure that it operates as efficiently as possible, both judicially in its public protection role, and as an independent statutory tribunal. Judge D F Clarkson Chair Page | 9 Appendix 1 Membership during the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 Chair Judge Dale Clarkson Deputy...

7. Wellington Standards Committee v Lester [2015] NZLCDT 23 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...them of the charges which she has admitted. Her present senior partner expresses confidence in her abilities and by inference confidence in her integrity and the belief that the public can have trust in her such that there is no requirement to protect the profession. [19] The applicant has responsibly acknowledged the mitigating factors that have been advanced on behalf of the respondent. Its primary submission is that the number of charges (the most serious of which is misconduct...

8. TP v RO LCRO 174/2012 (7 November 2014) [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...is to defray the costs of administering the complaints and disciplinary mechanisms of the Act, which otherwise fall on all lawyers. [42] The starting point is that Mrs TP was entitled to apply for a review. There is a clear focus on consumer protection within the broader purposes of the Act, and on open access to the complaints and disciplinary processes of the Act for members of the public such as Mrs TP. [43] It is also relevant when considering costs that the Committee did...

9. [2018] NZLCDT 9 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Name Suppressed [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...There must also be a duty to act in a professional, candid and straightforward way in dealing with the Society and its representatives …”5 [21] His Honour Cooper J went on to say: “[109] The duties to which I have referred do not exist to protect the sensibilities of those involved in administering the Act’s disciplinary provisions. While courtesy is a normal aspect of professional behaviour expected of a practitioner, it is not an end in itself. The purpose of the disciplina...

10. Parata v Lake - Ngarara West B3B (2004) 144 Aotea MB 105 (144 AOT 105) [pdf, 557 KB]

    ...convenience. For conlpleteness, I note that section 77(3) of the Act as referred to by the counsel for the Respondent provides an exception to the general ten year rule in the contexi, of section 45 applications. Decision For the reasons stated, after careful consideration of the evidence and subtnissions before the Couti, pursuant to section 37 of the Act the application is disnlissed. Counsel nlay \Nish to subnlit Inel110randa in respect of costs. Dated at Rotorua this ,---- da...