Search Results

1. SK and RM v GJ LCRO 36/2015 (14 December 2016) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...tenants in common in equal shares. All other property, including bank accounts, was owned by them as joint tenants. [14] According to Mrs HY, the couple's prime concern by May 2009 was to ensure that the survivor of the two was taken good care of. After the death of the survivor their 3 home should go to Mrs VW, a niece of Mr MT who for some years had taken care of the couple, and did not have a home of her own.1 [15] Mr MT's last will appointed the lawyers as t...

2. Recommendations recap - issue 12 [pdf, 996 KB]

   ...with any orders made under section 74 of the Act. 3 Contents Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 4 Adverse Effects or Reactions to Medical/Surgical Care .............................................. 4 Choking ...................................................................................................................... 5 Deaths in Custody ...............................................

3. Recommendations Recap - Issue 13 [pdf, 988 KB]

   ...http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2006/0038/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM5976687#DLM5976687 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2006/0038/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM5977147#DLM5977147 13 seatbelt and the bulldozer did not have a Roll Over Protection System to help protect the driver from crush injuries. Experience Inexperience and a lack of understanding of hazards have been cited as contributory factors leading to deaths at the workplace. In one case a coroner commented...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 86 Radius Residential Care Ltd v The NZ Nurses Organisation Inc [pdf, 182 KB]

   RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED v THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 86 [6 July 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 86 EMPC 265/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for an order for disclosure of documents BETWEEN RADIUS RESIDENTIAL CARE LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION INC...

5. [2020] NZIACDT 51 - NMS v Mercardo (3 December 2020) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...on her PA position at FGHL. Her visa at the time was due to expire on 12 December 2018. Immigration New Zealand wrote to Mr Mercado on 30 January 2019 identifying concerns with the work visa application. [16] An appeal to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (IPT) against the decline of the residence visa was dismissed on 14 February 2019. It was found that the complainant had not complied with the visa condition that she only work as a PA for 4 FGHL. In undertaking th...

6. Legal aid Family Fixed Fees Schedules [pdf, 870 KB]

   ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 PATERNITY – GRANTING NOTES .............................................................................................................................................. 29 PROTECTION OF PERSONAL & PROPERTY RIGHTS (PPPR) ................................................................................................ 30...

7. Family Fixed Fee Schedules [pdf, 870 KB]

   ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 PATERNITY – GRANTING NOTES .............................................................................................................................................. 29 PROTECTION OF PERSONAL & PROPERTY RIGHTS (PPPR) ................................................................................................ 30...

8. LCRO 28/2017 HK v TX (31 May 2019) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) may elect to conduct a review on the papers if he or she considers on the basis of all the information available, that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [25] After having carefully traversed the material on the file, I concluded that it would be appropriate to allow Mr TX an opportunity to respond to concerns I had identified in the course of a consideration of the written material before me. Those concerns...

9. NH v Singh LCRO 53/2013, 91/2013 and 115/2013 (27 August 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...to the lender as “she” or “it” in a way that suggested that the lender was not, in fact, QRS. When it appeared Mr NH may be unable to repay the loan on time, Mr Singh was actively involved in registering securities and taking steps to protect the lender’s interests. after 1 August 2008 constituted unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to s 12 of the LCA. [10] The Committee considered Mr Singh was deliberately evasive as to the identity of the lender, and as a director and sh...

10. Kettering v Biggleswade LCRO 212 / 2009 (19 March 2010) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...changed. DECISION [1] The Applicant is a barrister whose professional retainer involving two clients led the Standards Committee to conclude that the Applicant had acted in a conflict of interest in breach of Rule 6.1 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules and that there had been conduct unbecoming on the part of the Applicant. [2] The background is that the Applicant acted for C after she was charged with assault following a complaint to the police by her partner D. In defe...