Search Results

1. Jessup v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 70 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...(RNZAF) for six years between 1980, when he was 17, until 1986. 3. Mr Jessup was involved in aircraft maintenance, specifically the stripping and repainting of aircraft. The paints and paint strippers used contained isocyanates. 4. Personal protective equipment was used and consisted of “off the shelf” items such as air purifying masks with charcoal cartridges, cotton or disposable overalls, rubber gloves and safety goggles. 5. The bulk of Mr Jessup’s work time was spent on...

2. ZH v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 17 (10 February 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...terms and conditions to take money directly from ZH’s credit card without a proper process of disputes Page 4 of 5 resolution or investigation as to liability of damage in the first instance. I have considered this provision of the Act carefully and apply the discretion to disregard the hire agreement clause 21,22,23 of the hire agreement terms and conditions because they excluded or limited any right or remedy of the disputed issues by ZH. 24. Having found that ZH did...

3. Federated Farmers of New Zealand.pdf [pdf, 449 KB]

   ...permitted activities to adjust their farm systems discharge of N, P, sediment and E.coli. The Appellant has not specified how and when the stocking rate should be applied. Instead, if stocking rate is to apply to both dairy and drystock, careful assessment of implications and effectiveness is needed, as well as the threshold values chosen. The Appellant says Rule 3.11.4.3 applies a different permitted activity threshold metric for drystock farming compared to that applyin...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 131 Aquaculture New Zealand v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Landowners), seeking: (i) that the rules are amended so that re-consenting existing aquaculture in an Aquaculture Exclusion Area (AEA) is a fully discretionary activity; (ii) that the rules are amended so that Outstanding Natural Landscapes (ONL) are protected in the same manner as an Outstanding Natural Character (ONC) area; and (iii) that Rule C.1.3.2 is amended so that re-consenting existing aquaculture is a Significant Ecological Area (SEA), Outstanding Natural Feature (O...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 060 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI T AIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE l\tif\. TIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 60 of the Resource 1'1anagement Act 1991 of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on the attached schedule) Appellants

6. OIA-111174.pdf [pdf, 25 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 30 July 2024 Our ref: OIA 111174 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Returning Offenders Thank you for your email of 8 April 2024 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents relating to the management of offenders returning to New Zealand. Specifically, you requested: …any policy documents, memos, b

7. Nga Runanga EiC S McIntyre Planning Amended tracked 17 Feb 2021 [PDF, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

8. Nga Runanga EiC S McIntyre Planning Amended 17 Feb 2021 [PDF, 1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

9. Ngā Rūnanga - EiC – S McIntyre - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [PDF, 902 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND TE RŪNANGA O MOERAKI, KĀTI HUIRAPA RŪNAKA K

10. 29.-Evidence-of-Ms-Ainsley-McLeod-Conditions.pdf [pdf, 563 KB]

    ...Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1983 (made under Section 48A of the Conservation Act 1987); and (g) an authorisation given by the Director-General of the Department of Conservation under section 53 of the Wildlife Act 1953 in relation to any protected wildlife. 31. These further statutory approvals are not sought as part of the current process and instead: (a) are approvals under other legislation; (b) are separate, and generally subsequent, approvals and processes under the...