Search Results

1. Appendix 1 Draft 23rd-24th Reports under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [pdf, 483 KB]

   ...August 2018. The report does not repeat this information but does respond to follow up comments from the Committee. 3. In the Concluding Observations, the Committee recommended that the State party undertake broad consultation and dialogue with civil society in the preparation of the next periodic report. There was a four-week consultation with civil society for this report occurred prior to its finalisation. 4. The Committee also encouraged the State party to update its common co...

2. Draft 23rd-24th Reports under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [pdf, 483 KB]

   ...August 2018. The report does not repeat this information but does respond to follow up comments from the Committee. 3. In the Concluding Observations, the Committee recommended that the State party undertake broad consultation and dialogue with civil society in the preparation of the next periodic report. There was a four-week consultation with civil society for this report occurred prior to its finalisation. 4. The Committee also encouraged the State party to update its common co...

3. Family violence information sharing guidance [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   Sharing information safely Guidance on sharing personal information under the Family Violence Act 2018 Publication details This Guidance may be revised periodically. Make sure you are working with the most current version. Images used throughout this document are intended to illustrate providers networking and are from a photolibrary using models. Fo re w or d Foreword New Zealand has unacceptable rates of family violence, which severely undermine the lifetime wellbeing of v

4. Sharing Information Safely [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   Sharing information safely Guidance on sharing personal information under the Family Violence Act 2018 Ministry of Justice Tāhū o te Ture justice.govt.nz ISBN 978-0-478-32481-5 June 2019 This Guidance may be revised periodically. Make sure you are working with the most current version. Images used throughout this document are intended to illustrate providers networking and are from a photolibrary using models. Fo re w or d Foreword New Zealand has unacceptable rates o

5. LCRO 233/2014 IB v KZ (27 June 2018) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) which had made an unsatisfactory conduct finding, following inquiry into a complaint lodged by KZ Ltd (KZ). Background [2] Mr IB was instructed by Mr & Mrs RP, whose family home had been rendered uninhabitable by the Christchurch earthquake of 4 September 2010. [3] The RPs were insured with LDI, which was subsumed into KZ. By 2014, the RPs had been unable to resolve issues of compensation payable under...

6. [2023] NZREADT 16 - CAC 1901 v KC (3 July 2023) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...3. On 19 January 2019, the defendant showed [the purchasers] and their son around the property. During this visit, [both the purchasers] asked the defendant whether the property or area was safe. The defendant responded that it was, and that her family had lived in the house for 10 years and they had loved it, and the only reason they were selling was to build a new house in the same area. 4. The defendant did not inform the [purchasers] about the two burglaries. [3] It is contend...

7. LCRO 78/2017 UT v HB (26 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

   LCRO 78/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN UT Applicant AND HB Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms UT has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] (the Committ

8. Nakarawa v AFFCO NZ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 168 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 011/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN JALESI NAKARAWA PLAINTIFF AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED DEFENDANT AT HAMILTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms PJ Davies, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr MD Benefield for Plaintiff Ms ME Wilson for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 19 December 2011 DATE OF LAST SUBMISSIONS: 28 Nov

9. Kennedy v Real Estate Agent Authority (CAC 403) & Lonergan [2016] NZREADT 81 [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...T to believe he had permission.  The fact that the request for the key came relatively late at night [17] Ms Kennedy submits that Mr Lonergan did not have the permission to hand out the key to the property to anyone and that the fact that a family member of Ms Kennedy’s had facilitated this situation does not alter the fact that this conduct amounts to misconduct. Ms Kennedy also points to the significant nature of the damage inflicted by Mr and Mrs T in removing Ms Kennedy’...

10. [2021] NZREADT 46 - Tapu (23 August 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

    ...language. The licensee was censured, ordered to pay a fine of $6,000 and to contribute $3,500 towards the costs of the disciplinary proceeding. [33] In the case of Robson, the purchaser of a property advised the licensee that he had a young family and because of that, and the purchaser’s work requirements, a safe and secure home environment was of paramount importance. The licensee failed to disclose to the purchaser that the property concerned, which was marketed as a family-...