Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 184 Tasman District Council v Awaroa Aerodrome Ltd [pdf, 1 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE NlATTER OF BE1WEEN AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 184 an application for enforcement orders under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 TASNlAN DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-000004) Applicant AW AROA AERODROME LIMITED First Respondent ZACHARYTHONlAS ATHFIELD Second Respondent THE ESTATE OF IAN CHARLES ATHFIELD Third Respondent ROGER NEIL TAYLOR Fourth Respo

2. Supplementary Government Response to Law Commissions report [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...following statutory provisions, and any similar provisions should be amended so that relevant requests are treated as information privacy requests in appropriate cases: Coroners Act 1988 (section 44); Transport Services Licensing Act 1989 (section 24); Civil Aviation Act 1990 (sections 10, 19, and 74); Building Act 1991 (2nd Schedule, clause 7); Maritime Transport Act 1994 (sections 49, 50, 189, and 276); Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 (section 53). Agree. Implement du...

3. Tauranga-Moana-Courthouse-Cabinet-paper_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...Aotearoa New Zealand. Strong and independent courts are fundamental to the wellbeing of society. They help ensure New Zealanders can trust each other and trust the state. A loss of confidence in the justice system could affect how society behaves, and how disputes might be resolved and the public protected. 36. The efficiency and integrity of the court experience influences people’s wellbeing and ability to move on with their lives. Many people coming to courts are vulnerable and seeki...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 132 Caradoc-Davies v S R Clearwater [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...[5] By agreement of the parties I had, during intervening months, conducted some 3 by consent directing certain remedial landscaping works on some parts of the property.1 [6] Progress towards further settlement stalled, hindered particularly by dispute over the correct interpretation of the terms of the 2006 resource consent referred to above, allegations having been made by the Applicants that the Respondents had exceeded consented activities, spatially; these allegations being d...

5. Deliu v New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...repercussions, public or private of 12 granting interim relief. See by analogy Carlton & United Breweries. It is also settled law that discretionary relief can be refused if an alternative remedy exists. See by way of example Skelton v Family Court at Hamilton [2007] 3 NZLR 368 at [116]. Whether evidence of discrimination [54] For convenience we examine first the strength of the claim that there has been unlawful discrimination on the grounds of “political opinion”....

6. Pilbrow & Anor as Trustees of the Pilbrow Family Trust v Moorhead [2011] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 352 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000059 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 31 BETWEEN OWEN IVOR MAUL PILBROW and JOAN GWENDOLINE PILBROW as Trustees of the PILBROW FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND HUGH CHARLES MOORHEAD and BARBARA MARY MOORHEAD First Respondents AND CRAVEN BUILDERS LIMITED Second Respondent AND EUROPLAST FINISHES LIMITED Third Respondent AND LANCE CLARK Fourth Respondent AND DAVID TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND GIANNI MA...

7. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 2 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   NATIONAL OVERVIEW volume i i Professor Alan Ward Waitangi Tribunal Rangahaua Whanui Series WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1997 A Waitangi Tribunal publication © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1997 isbn 1-86956-208-9 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui research programme. Any views expr

8. Kettlewell & Anor as Trustees for the DS Day Trust v Crighton [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...Respondents, and are pursuing their claim against the First Respondents, but not the Third Respondent. BURDEN OF PROOF [13] WHRS proceedings tend to be less formal than litigation but nevertheless it needs to be confirmed that they are “civil” proceedings in which claimants must prove their claims to the civil standard of the “balance of probabilities” – what is more probable than not? The relevant legal principles, tortious and/or contractual, are applied to the pr...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 212 Kavallaris v Inframax Construction Ltd [pdf, 295 KB]

   ALEXIOS KAVALLARIS v INFRAMAX CONSTRUCTION LTD [2024] NZEmpC 212 [6 November 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 212 EMPC 270/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ALEXIOS KAVALLARIS Plaintiff AND INFRAMAX CONSTRUCTION LTD Defendant Hearing: 19 September 2024 and by submissions f

10. Tidmarsh v Glover [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...COWPERTHWAITE LIMITED (Now struck out) Fifth respondent AND STEVEN COOK Sixth respondent AND ROBERT NEIL BOLER Seventh respondent AND JOHN RITCHIE GLOVER and NEIL GOLLAN as Trustees of the Glover Family Trust Eighth respondents CLAIM NO.01086 – TIDMARSH DETERMINATION.doc 2 INDEX INTRODUCTION 5 MATERIAL FACTS 7 THE HEARING 9 THE CLAIM 11 CAUSES OF ACTION...