LCRO 127/2017 EZ v UO [pdf, 265 KB]
...Standards Committee determination, 16 May 2017 at [5]. 3 (b) failed to treat Mrs EZ with respect and courtesy; (c) ignored a Judge’s direction to provide her file to another lawyer; (d) failed to disclose all relevant documents; (e) charged fees that were excessive; and (f) failed to release her files to her new lawyers in a timely fashion, despite having been directed by a judge to do so. [14] Mr UO provided a response to the complaint on 29 December 2016. [15] He submitt...