Search Results

1. AR v ZE LCRO 83/2012 (2 April 2014) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...$780, a LINZ fee of $80, plus GST of $117. Both versions of the invoice say the fee is to be paid by deduction from the proceeds of sale on settlement and both were sent to the ARs. [37] At 15:47 on 30 June 2011 the ARs say they emailed the firm requesting account details so they could pay the fee for the sale over the internet. A copy of the ARs’ email also indicates the ARs’ view, which they confirmed at the review hearing, that the firm’s website was misleading in that it...

2. BORA Court Matters Bill [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...there are reasonable grounds to believe the item may threaten the security of the court, the individual may be asked to leave the item with the CSO while he is in court. 6. A CSO can deny entry to or remove an individual who does not agree to these requests. A CSO can also do so if the person refuses to show a CSO a detected item (and the CSO has no reasonable grounds to believe a specified offence may have been, or is about to be, committed in the court or immediately adjacent area).

3. Māori Land Court Minute Book Referencing [pdf, 470 KB]

   ...in Wellington. Hints and Tips • Court staff can’t search for a minute or judgment based on subject. You need to have an application number (post 1999) and/or a proper minute book reference • Where possible – always express your requests using the minute book syntax and its abbreviation. If you have your syntax correct, staff can simply enter the reference into the records system and retrieve the minute or judgment • Try and establish a location for the heari...

4. LCRO 141/2013 TM v DC (7 June 2017) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...decision-maker, rather than remaining Mr TM’s legal advisor. [48] That allegation means that Mr TM became incapable of resisting Mr DC’s conviction that Mr TM should cancel the agreements. [49] At the commencement of the review hearing Mr TM was requested to provide some information as to his business background. He advised that: (a) After leaving school, he had undertaken an apprenticeship as a fitter and turner. (b) In 1981, he had acquired and operated a service stat...

5. [2020] NZEnvC 124 Sidwell v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...is able to consider and grant a waiver that would effectively revive it. He reads ss37 and 37 A as providing to that effect. He attempted to secure such relief in discussions with TCDC, including with the Mayor. However, on legal advice, TCDC informed him that it had no jurisdiction to give him the relief he seeks. Rather, it says he must re-apply for subdivision consent if he wants to proceed with his development. [4] In that context, Dr Sidwell seeks the following declaration: E...

6. [2019] NZREADT 39 - Feschiev - Ruling [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...started from the date of the penalty decision was correct. [26] The Committee’s final decision, in which it decided not to make any penalty orders following its finding that Ms Cruickshank had engaged in unsatisfactory conduct, and declined her request for an order that her name not be published, was issued on 18 June 2019. Ms Cruickshank was given notice of the decision that day. Accordingly, the 20 working day appeal period ended on 16 July 2019. She did not file an appea...

7. Derek Onley (filed 6 June 2017) [pdf, 820 KB]

   ...significance of nearby habitats, habitat modification, decommissioning, legislation and legal obligations amongst other considerations. I have appended the ecological report in Appendix 1. Unfortunately the ornithological chapter file is corrupted. I have requested another copy which can be supplied if required. 9.3.42. In my opinion pre-construction monitoring is essential and should be of the high quality and scope exhibited by that carried out for the single turbine at the RSPB at...

8. Iwi panels: an evaluation of their implementation & operation at Hutt Valley, Gisborne & Manukau from 2014 to 2015 [pdf, 568 KB]

   1 Iwi panels An evaluation of their implementation and operation at Hutt Valley, Gisborne and Manukau from 2014 to 2015 Final report 17 June 2016 Prepared for Ministry of Justice, New Zealand Police and Department of Corrections Prepared by Akroyd Research & Evaluation Shaun Akroyd Judy Paulin Kirimatao Paipa Nan Wehipeihana 2 Contents Glossary ..............................................................................

9. QX v ZW LCRO 134/2014 (21 October 2016) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...QX in its letter dated 7 April 2011. The services to be provided were described as: 8 … [including] advice and representation regarding your relationship property matters with [Mr RF]. Initially you have instructed us to write to [Mr RF] and request that the family home be listed at the price of $350,000 until Christmas. [31] As 2011 progressed there were exchanges of correspondence between the firm and Mr RF’s lawyer, and subsequently as between the firm and Mr RF directly.9...

10. Research report: Without notice applications in the Family Court [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    Nan Wehipeihana, Kellie Spee and Shaun Akroyd Research Evaluation Consultancy Limited – a member of the Kinnect Group Without Notice Applications in the Family Court A research report prepared for the Ministry of Justice Acknowledgements Thank you to the parents and grandparents who participated in this research. Your contribution to the research was invaluable and deeply aided our understanding of the motivations and