Search Results

1. E93 Craig Fitzgerald - Noise and Vibration - RE – Applicant [pdf, 11 MB]

   31088866_1.docx BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consent for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority REBUTTAL EVIDE

2. LCRO 2011 Annual Report [pdf, 919 KB]

   Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 223 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 Report of the LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER For the 12 months ended 30 June 2011 Annual Report 2011 | Legal Complaints Review Officer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ___________________________________________________________________________________________ LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICE Overview of the year 2009/2010 ........................................

3. Pacey v Adlam - Matata Parish 39A 2B 2B 2A (2017) 178 Waiariki MB 32 (178 WAR 32) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...voting, Ms Savage argued that more explanation should have been given about the process, particularly as there were a number of proxies that were ruled invalid. She advised that she had also expected there would be an opportunity to amend the proxy forms at the meeting. She submitted that as such the invalid proxy votes should be reinstated. [11] Ms Savage submitted that the confusion mainly resulted from the fact that the elections for both trusts were run together. She argued...

4. AF v X Standards Committee LCRO 84/2014 [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...BETWEEN AF Applicant AND X STANDARDS COMMITTEE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms AF seeks to review the X Standards Committee’s request for her to produce files and documents, those documents sought by the Committee in order to assist with pursuing enquiry into a complaint made against Ms AF by Mr Z. Background [2] In 2009, Mr Z instructed a [town] law firm to act...

5. OIA-98262.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 16 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 98262 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Nature of democracy and the evolution of democracy Thank you for your email of 10 August 2022 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information related to the nature of democracy. Specifically, you requested: “…...

6. Reihana-Ngatote - Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A3B2A (2016) 132 Taitokerau MB 120 (132 TTK 120) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...rates and other expenses of Okahu 3B2B2B or any other non-income-producing blocks? (b) What is the Trust’s responsibility for meeting rates in relation to land that is non-income-producing? (c) How should the Trust deal with Kristine Te Paa’s request that the rates demand be set-off against her Whānau Trust’s entitlement to distributions from other land blocks? [30] Mr Mahoney also raised a question as to whether Kristine Te Paa was acting in a conflict of interest in rai...

7. SE v VT, DJ and CM LCRO 163/2014 (11 March 2015) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS). These were summarised as follows by the Standards Committee: • Mr VT and Mr CM were alleged to have “refused to release files and/or financial records belonging to the company upon request by [Mr SE] and denied that they held such files/records”.1 • They purported to act for the company without having proper authority to do so. • They had conflicts of interest and breached client confidentiality....

8. Sherard v Devereux and others - Otakanini Māori Reservatio (Haranui Marae) (2016) 140 Taitokerau MB 60 (140 TTK 60) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...Timoti, who are represented by Mr Robertson. [3] The issue in this case is whether an interim injunction should be granted. [4] As with all oral decisions, I reserve the right to amend this decision but any such amendments shall only be as to form not as to substance and not to change the outcome of the decision that I am about to make. Background [5] This reservation was set apart over the Otakanini Reservation Block by notice in the New Zealand Gazette on 26 October 1939: 1...

9. [2017] EmpC 90 Nathan v Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd (formerly Transfield) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...not take up his former position and resume active duties immediately after the judgment from the Court of Appeal was released. Broadspectrum’s delay in returning Mr Nathan to work led to an application for a compliance order combined with a request for urgency on 30 May 2017. The catalyst for that application was an indication by Broadspectrum that Mr Nathan’s return to actual work would be deferred for 14 days after the date of the Court of Appeal judgment and that he also ne...

10. [2020] NZSAAA 1 (3 February 2020) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...in commencing her studies had effectively deprived her of a year of Student Allowance support (ie in 2015) and amounted to “special circumstances” justifying a one year extension. [7] In mid 2018 she applied for an allowance for 2019 and again requested an extension citing both the “lost” year in 2015 and the fact that she didn’t receive an allowance in 2016 as a result of the ACC payments she received following the accident. This was declined because she had already received...