Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 152 Davis v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...and the Inspector had decided, following further inquiries, that there was simply no evidence to show that the Senior Constable had abused his position in relation to the cell incidents. The inquiry was not to be taken further. Mr Davis was informed of this at a meeting on 3 September 2009. He reacted badly, telling the Senior Sergeant that he was wrong and accusing him and the Inspector of sweeping the matter under the carpet and conducting a cover-up. He indicated that he no l...

2. Tamplin v Boizard [2021] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...Tamplin’s brother, Neville Tamplin, to Dr Boizard. Mr Neville Tamplin expressed to Dr Boizard his concern that Mr Tamplin may be taken overseas by Ms Valsalan and that his family would not see Mr Tamplin again if 3 that occurred. Mr Neville Tamplin requested that Dr Boizard check on Mr Tamplin as soon as possible and write a letter stating Mr Tamplin was unfit to fly. Mr Neville Tamplin also advised Dr Boizard that Mr Guest held an enduring power of attorney (EPOA) in respect of...

3. [2023] NZEmpC 29 Bowen v Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...J C HOLDEN (Appearance under protest to jurisdiction; application to dismiss proceedings; application for non-publication) [1] Ms Bowen filed her statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) in 2017. She claims she was unjustifiably dismissed and unjustifiably disadvantaged by the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) in retaliation for her raising concerns about what she considered to be serious wrongdoing by BNZ. [2] The Authority has previous...

4. Ratima v Smith - Te Haroto 2B2B (2024) 113 Tākitimu MB 287 (113 TKT 287) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...executive decision to allocate one voting form to each of the 68 persons who were identified on the final shareholders list, after taking into account those who appeared more than once on that list and known deceased persons. (c) Numbered voting forms were sent to the 68 persons on the final shareholder lists, together with a cover letter, directions to complete the voting form and a stamped envelope addressed to the returning officer. (d) 42 owners responded to the ballot. 29 of...

5. DM v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 872 (10 December 2024) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...adequate fence - that would obviously not be a tenable situation. 15. The above factors lead me then to consider whether the boundary fence that existed prior to H Ltd’s removal of it would have been considered ‘adequate’. I have little information about its age or condition (although I think it was generally accepted that it was by no means new), but based on photographs provided by both parties, I consider that its mixed nature, being comprised of varying materials (including c...

6. FI v CC [2025] NZDT 105 (12 February 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...exercise reasonable care and skill of a professional appropriate to his professional status or that the final outcome produced was not reasonably fit for purpose. I say this for reasons which include: a. There were no concerns expressed about the form and function of the veneers, and I also accept the evidence from the specialist Prosthodontist Dr X, who reviewed the clinical photos taken before and after, that the restorations have been done to a good standard. b. I gave greater w...

7. BL v TX & L Ltd [2025] NZDT 239 (13 June 2025) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...This was a private sale. The consumer protection provided by legislation including the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, the Fair Trading Act 1986, and the Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 does not apply. 14. TX had no legal obligation to disclose any information about the vehicle to DO. TX had no legal obligation to ensure that the vehicle was mechanically sound, or safe. 15. The only arguable legal basis for DO’s claim is misrepresentation or mistake. 16. The essential elements of...

8. BORA Ngāti Haua Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...consistent with articles 14 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which are comparable to sections 20 and 27 (2) of the Bill of Rights Act.[2] Exclusion of Remedy of Compensation - clause 25(3) 8. Clause 25(3) excludes any form of monetary compensation as a remedy for any failure of the Crown to comply with the taonga tuturu protocol issued under Part 2 of the Bill. 9. We have considered whether these clauses limit the right to bring civil proceedings a...

9. Wai-3300-A001-Report-Three-Research-Reports-Concerning-Constitutional-Issues.pdf [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...Chief Judge) as Presiding Officer, and Derek Fox, Dr Grant Phillipson, Prue Kapua, and Kevin Prime as members of the Tribunal panel.1 Professor David Williams and Dr Monty Soutar are now also members of this panel.2 In January 2023, Chief Judge Fox requested Tribunal Unit staff provide a review and summary of existing research completed for other Tribunal inquiries that may be of relevance to the Constitutional Kaupapa Inquiry. The Presiding Officer also requested a review and summary...

10. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

    t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo