Search Results

1. C Ltd v V Ltd & LV [2023] NZDT 658 (21 November 2023) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...LV The Tribunal orders: V Ltd and LV (jointly and severally) are to pay C Ltd $6,342.86 by 13 December 2023. Background 1. This is one of two claims brought by [C Ltd], the owner of commercial premises at [Address], against the former tenant of those premises, V Ltd. 2. C Ltd purchased the premises from the previous owners DX and EE. 3. DX established a retail business known as [Business], which he operated from the premises. 4. In September 2016 a Deed of...

2. BB v DN Ltd [2020] NZDT 1533 (18 March 2020) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...of probabilities that BB suffered the loss claimed. 9. It is therefore unnecessary to consider the other two issues. The claim must be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 18 March 2020 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

3. ZA v ZM [2024] NZDT 225 (31 January 2024) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...Reasons: 1. The Applicant claimed that in March 2022 the Respondent agreed to rent a house with him and a third party. The Respondent was overseas at the time, and the Applicant claims that although they filled in and sent separate application forms for the property, that he had obtained the Respondent’s permission to sign the tenancy agreement on his behalf and had done so. 2. The Applicant claims that after the tenancy agreement was signed and the tenancy commenced, that when...

4. EMPC Form 1 - Statement of claim regarding an ERA determination [doc, 49 KB]

   r 7(l) Form 1 Under the Employment Relations Act 2000 In the Employment Court No: / (Auckland, Wellington or Christchurch* Registry (the reference number allocated by *Corresponds to the ERA registry) the registry, i.e. EMPC/) Election to have matter heard in the Employment Court Between ………………………………………. [full name] of ……………………….. ………………………………………. [address] …………………...

5. K Ltd v UD [2024] NZDT 568 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...“Equipment Add-Ons” the contract states “Please tick to confirm your desired pool equipment upgrades”. One of the upgrade options listed and ticked in UD’s contract is: LED POOL LIGHT – includes 1 multi coloured LED light with transformer $850.00 NOTE we recommend 2 lights in pools 8m or larger. 10. It is not disputed that 2 LED lights were supplied by K Ltd to UD. K Ltd says the lights were overlooked when UD was invoiced and she was not charged. 1 Which was done o...

6. Make a claim

   You can make a claim Online or In person. It costs $87 to make a claim to the Tribunal.Application fees are non-refundable and cannot be waived. What you need to make a claim Completed form Check the Motor Vehicle Traders Register for the trader name, registration and address Details of your complaint, including Why you were attracted to the vehicle (e.g by advertisement or otherwise) Any statements made about the vehicle at the time of sale The performance of the vehicle during the test...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal

7. Lochead-MacMillan v AMI Insurance [2012] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...Waiuku home and contents with AMI. On 9 January 2010 a fire occurred at a garage/sleepout and a claim to AMI was notified the following day. In the course of the investigation and during the negotiations over the claim Mr and Mrs Lochead-MacMillan requested that AMI provide specific personal information. In these proceedings under the Privacy Act 1993 they contend that AMI failed to respond to their requests in a manner that complied with AMI’s responsibilities as an agency under the...

8. HN & SN v T [2023] NZDT 5 (15 March 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...entitled to be compensated for? Was TT entitled to cancel the contract to purchase HN and SN’s property at [Property]? 8. TT signed an unconditional written contract to purchase HN and SN’s [Property] and was bound by her obligation to perform her promise to complete the sale. TT did not attend the hearing to advance any evidence why she considered she was entitled to cancel the contract. I accept the evidence of HN and SN that it was for TT to perform her own due diligence t...

9. Weathertight homes

   The Weathertight Homes Tribunal provides a speedy, cost-effective resolution process for the owners of leaky homes. Only parties with an eligible claim from the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment (MBIE) can bring a claim to the Weathertight Homes Tribunal.  The time period to lodge a claim with MBIE expired on 31 December 2021.  No new claims can be accepted by MBIE. About the tribunal The government recognised the difficulties with resolving leaky home claims and set up...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals

10. Sax v Commissioner of Police (Strike-Out – Discrimination) [2022] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...three days prior to Ms Sax filing her submissions in support of her application for anonymity in the Tribunal. In the Minute, the Chairperson indicated the interim orders made may need to be revisited. A timetable was set requiring Ms Sax to file information in relation to why there had been no disclosure. The Chairperson also required Ms Sax to provide details of other proceedings, including appeals, in which name suppression had been sought by her and the outcome of those applications...