Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 72 — CJ v ACC (3 May 2022) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...certificate; as per the Carey judgment. Non-lawyer advocates who assist the Court would usually be awarded a daily rate of 50 per cent, based on category 1. Mr Claver did not assist the Court prior to the hearing, and a number of the steps claimed by him were not undertaken or were undertaken by the Corporation. In addition, disbursements claimed, excluding printing, cannot be claimed if not professionally incurred. Relevant law [4] Rule 4.1.1 of the District Court Rules 2009...

2. Pawnbroker duties

   Keep a pawnbrokers record You must keep a pawnbrokers record for all goods you acquire in your business. This must contain: the identity of the pledger including their name, contact address, and contact phone number the form of identity you used to verify the pledger’s identity (this can be verified by seeing the person’s authorised identification\), date of birth, and that they are 18 years or over the pledger’s signature a description of the goods including their serial number or unique...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Licences & certificates >
   3. Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers & Pawnbrokers >
   4. Your duties

3. Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...recommended action involves cancellation of a provider’s approval. • A decision is made • any appropriate action is taken • the provider is notified • the complainant is notified, and • the provider is advised of the opportunity to request a review of the decision. After 10 working days of CI notifying the provider of the decision. If a review is not requested, the complainant (if any) is advised of the decision and the reasons for the decision. The compla...

4. Legal Aid Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 633 KB]

   ...recommended action involves cancellation of a provider’s approval. • A decision is made • any appropriate action is taken • the provider is notified • the complainant is notified, and • the provider is advised of the opportunity to request a review of the decision. After 10 working days of CI notifying the provider of the decision. If a review is not requested, the complainant (if any) is advised of the decision and the reasons for the decision. The compla...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Part IV Te Urewera [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...value of the land to the owners, and the amount of other comparable land retained by them ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 (b) Did the Crown give proper consideration to taking other lands instead, or to non-permanent forms of alienation ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 (c) Was the national interest sufficient to outweigh the interests of the landowners in retaining their land ? . . . . . . ....

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 6 Te Urewera [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...value of the land to the owners, and the amount of other comparable land retained by them ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 (b) Did the Crown give proper consideration to taking other lands instead, or to non-permanent forms of alienation ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 (c) Was the national interest sufficient to outweigh the interests of the landowners in retaining their land ? . . . . . . ....

7. AU v Accident Compensation Corporation (Impairment Assessment) [2023] NZACC 182 [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...July 2021, Dr Bahr lodged a medical certificate noting that AU was unfit for work from 5 July 2021 to 4 September 2021 because of an “added diagnosis of post-concussion syndrome and chronic pain syndrome”. [70] On 29 July 2021, the Corporation requested medical information from Dr Bahr to assess whether the additional cover requested should be granted. [71] On 21 October 2021, ACC Medical Advisor, Michael Ames, assessed whether it was appropriate to add cover for the reques...

8. Goode v CAC 20002 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...and his partner eventually purchased the property on 28 November 2011 for $425,000. [4] A summary of the complaint against the licensee in respect of this transaction is as follows: [a] The complainant alleges that the licensee provided false information about an EQC assessment of the property by saying that the EQC had not assessed the property when, in fact, an assessment had taken place on 20 October 2011. The complainant is of the view that the licensee, GLE, and Ms Collier joine...

9. BU v YA LCRO 153 / 2010 (21 April 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...BV. [2] In February 2003, the Applicant and his brother were registered as the proprietors of a property at X Road, North Island. The registered proprietors of the property were recorded as “BU and BW”. [3] On 29 January 2004, a Notice of Claim pursuant to s42 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 against the Applicant’s interest in the property was lodged by the Respondent on behalf of Mrs BV. [4] A number of attempts were made by the Applicant to have the Notice of Cla...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 131 Yang v L E Builders Ltd [pdf, 66 KB]

    ...for L E Builders Limited Judgment: 18 October 2011 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] After hearing a full and excellent argument from both counsel, in support of and in opposition to the plaintiff’s application to join the former sole director of the defendant company Lawrence Leong Eng Loo as a party, I determined that the most appropriate course was to adjourn the application until the substantive challenge has been disposed of. The following are my reason...