Search Results

1. BR v YI Ltd 2015 NZDT 803 (25 June 2015) [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...that was contracted for. [7] BR contends that ABC should have included in its report the presence of a commercially fitted oil catch-can as he has since been advised that this is indicative of engine problems. ABC disputes this and presented information on oil catch-cans sourced from the internet. I accept that this search revealed no information that suggested the presence of an oil catch-can points to problems, rather that they are fitted to improve engine performance. [8] BR...

2. [2022] NZACC 72 — CJ v ACC (3 May 2022) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...certificate; as per the Carey judgment. Non-lawyer advocates who assist the Court would usually be awarded a daily rate of 50 per cent, based on category 1. Mr Claver did not assist the Court prior to the hearing, and a number of the steps claimed by him were not undertaken or were undertaken by the Corporation. In addition, disbursements claimed, excluding printing, cannot be claimed if not professionally incurred. Relevant law [4] Rule 4.1.1 of the District Court Rules 2009...

3. BU v YA LCRO 153 / 2010 (21 April 2011) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...BV. [2] In February 2003, the Applicant and his brother were registered as the proprietors of a property at X Road, North Island. The registered proprietors of the property were recorded as “BU and BW”. [3] On 29 January 2004, a Notice of Claim pursuant to s42 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 against the Applicant’s interest in the property was lodged by the Respondent on behalf of Mrs BV. [4] A number of attempts were made by the Applicant to have the Notice of Cla...

4. B Ltd v KS [2022] NZDT 256 (21 December 2022) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...second trip would involve additional costs. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 8. However, having given an estimate based on an assumption of tank size, the onus was on B Ltd to check that assumption on arrival on site and allow KS to make an informed decision about further costs. 9. For the above reasons, I find that it is reasonable for KS to pay more than the amount estimated based on the disposal of 3000L, because that is the service he actually received, but the increased c...

5. How to apply

   ...District Courts scheduling and hearing fee What you must do before you apply to the tribunal To lodge an objection to a valuation with the tribunal, you must first complain to your district council or Quotable Value. What you need to send us Fill in this form and send it to us, along with a copy of the council’s or Quotable Value’s decision about your complaint. Objection to valuation Send your application to the tribunal nearest you You must lodge your objection with the tribunal within 2...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Land & title >
   3. Land Valuation Tribunal

6. [2016] NZEmpC 179 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v The Rail and Maritime Transport Union & Anor [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...if they believe there is a risk to health and safety in doing so. [4] LPC now seeks urgent injunctions. The first application seeks to restrain RMTU and its members being involved in the proposed strike action, and to resume employment and perform duties as instructed. [5] The second seeks to restrain MUNZ and its members from participating in picketing which is intended to interfere, or would have the effect of interfering, with the employment of any LPC employee; and to advise...

7. [2022] NZACC 138 — Williams v ACC (19 July 2022) [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...issue is a decision by the Accident Compensation Corporation dated 25 July 2019 declining cover for a consequential treatment injury. [2] The appellant underwent a right inguinal hernia repair on 18 May 2017. [3] On 21 February 2019, an ACC injury claim form was filed for a misadventure said to have occurred during the right inguinal hernia repair on 18 May 2017. ACR 159/20 Background [4] The appellant consulted Dr Miller on 8 March 2017 and described how he felt a sharp str...

8. Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 48 [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...claimants needed to be involved. In any event, the claimants needed to prove their claims against the other respondents. (f) The claimants have not established that costs and expenses were unnecessarily incurred by them. The Council’s case forms only part of the time allocated by the Tribunal for the hearing of the adjudication. At least a day was required by the Tribunal to hear from the other respondents (not the Council) and deal with proving the claimants’ claim...

9. LCRO 127/2024 ZU v TC, NE, GQ and Law firm A (13 June 2025) [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...confidentiality had caused her significant financial loss. [30] Ms ZU explained that her financial circumstances were difficult. She hoped that matters could be resolved without need for intervention of the court. [31] [Law firm A] responded with request of Ms ZU to advise as to what proposal she would suggest to settle the matter. [32] Ms ZU responded with indication that she could make payments of $30.00 a week to the outstanding invoices. [33] [Law firm A] were prepared to acc...

10. Wiezoreck v McHugh [2013] NZIACDT 35 (4 June 2013) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...in relation to fees. [4] Each of the issues was essentially factual. There was also an element of judgement regarding the advice Ms McHugh gave Mr Wiezoreck in relation to his immigration prospects. [5] It suffices to note Ms McHugh provided information to establish the only aspect of the complaint that would potentially be upheld was the issue relating to fees. [6] That was the most serious aspect of the complaint. When Ms McHugh disclosed her file it emerged she had told Mr Wiezore...