LCRO 8/2014 HTO v AG [pdf, 216 KB]
...any unfortunate misunderstanding if HTO had taken the fax as a threat, expressed the hope resolution of the matter could be achieved “amicably through clearer communication and cooperation”, and invited further discussion. [12] HTO replied requesting payment of $3,920 by 13 February 2012. Mr AG did not pay. Complaint [13] In July 2013, Ms J laid a complaint on behalf of HTO alleging Mr AG had contravened r 2.7 of the Rules by making a threat for an improper purpose. In he...