Search Results

1. LCRO 105/2018 SW v NL (23 August 2019) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...basis the bank loan was “discharged” on the sale of the property. Mr NL proposed a payment of $140,000 without mentioning the bank loan. [12] On [date] 2017 Mr NL informed the bank that Mr RA, for whom he acted, had sold the property. Mr NL requested a release of the bank’s mortgage over the property. He stated that until resolution of the relationship property differences the mortgage over the company’s property would “remain”. [13] On [date] 2017 Ms SW’s lawye...

2. OIA-117369.pdf [pdf, 398 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 17 December 2024 Ref: OIA 117369 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Kaupapa Inquiry funding I refer to your email of 26 September 2024 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information relating to funding for Waitangi Tribunal kaupapa inquiries. On...

3. Van Workum & Ors as Trustees of the Van Workum Family Trust v Auckland City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...long after moving in, Ms Van Workum realised that the dwelling was leaky and lodged a claim with the Department of Building and Housing on 6 January 2006 whereby the WHRS Assessor concluded in his report that the claim is eligible. Accordingly, claims and cross-claims were made against the ten respondents in this claim. Mediation [4] A mediation hearing was held on 15 December 2009 at the office of the Tribunal. All parties to this claim attended the mediation except t...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 175 Invacare New Zealand Ltd v Pyne [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...compensation for lost wages and $8,500 compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the compensation figure having been reduced by 15 per cent for contribution). [2] Mr Pyne filed a non-de novo challenge in the Court, claiming that the Authority erred in fact and law in its approach to the calculation of non-pecuniary loss under s 123(1)(c)(i). The challenge was filed on 1 July 2022, which was 24 days after the date of the Authority’s determination. Th...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 63 Premier Events Group Ltd v Beattie Ors [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...jurisdiction, of this delay and the reasons for it. [4] Before turning to PEGL’s claim for an order staying the balance of the proceedings in this Court (being an assessment of damages that may be due by Mr Beattie to PEGL), it is important to record formally what the Court has and has not done to date. In respect of those causes of action by PEGL against Mr Beattie that remain alive, the Court has not entered judgment for PEGL. Rather, on questions of liability alone, it has...

6. Form 15 Waitangi Tribunal Amendment [pdf, 193 KB]

   Legal Aid Services use only Approve Further information Refuse Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 15 Amendment to Grant Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings Legal Aid File No. Date Covers the period from to Customer WAI Number Provider Inquiry Stage of Inquiry for this Claim Stage 1 – Case Book Stage 2 – Interlocutory f Stage 3 – Hearing Lead Provider Provider 2 Other Provider Number...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 127 Bishop v Bennett [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...which caused great distress to the passengers and delayed the ship’s return to port. Ms Bennet arrived back in Timaru late on Saturday 2 August 2008. [8] Ms Bennet went back to work on Monday 4 August 2008. In her absence, Mr Bishop had again formed the view that Ms Bennet had been dishonest in the course of her employment. One of his concerns was that Ms Bennet had purchased unnecessary stationery and items for herself on the business account at Warehouse Stationery. He had g...

8. OIA-103324.pdf [pdf, 779 KB]

   Section (9)(2)(a) Tena koe- FIMRIPII Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@Justice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Official Information Act request: Concurrent and cumulative sentences Thank you for your email of 15 March 2023 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents produced or received by the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) regarding concurrent and cumulative sentences since 1 January 2...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 106 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...25 November 2020. He applied for 20 days’ leave commencing on 10 December 2020. He did not provide a return to work date. It can be inferred that he wished the leave to cover the earliest available days. [11] Tranzit did not reply to this request until 23 December 2020, well after the date that Mr Morgan had proposed to commence his leave. That response, which the company has since resiled from, claimed that Mr Morgan would have no leave entitlement until 2024 as he had been...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 108 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...it will be disclosed by the Union to the plaintiff on the partial waiver of privilege basis referred to specifically at [36] below. [22] Document 98 is legal advice dated 27 April 2012 provided by Mr Oldfield to the Union’s Mr Richards and the claimed privilege in it is upheld. [23] So, too, is document 99 with the same result. [24] Document 100 is an email chain between an officer of the Union and Mr Oldfield for which legal professional privilege is claimed, but will be disclose...