Search Results

1. OIA-Firearms regulations [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...first instance, Collection Services will seek payment in full or negotiate sustainable payment arrangements where possible. If payment if not made, the court can take enforcement action, which can include: S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) • clamping vehicles, • seizing and selling property, • making compulsory deductions from a person’s income or bank account, • issuing warrants to arrest, and • preventing a person’s international travel. In some circumstance...

2. What happens if you don't pay your fines?

   ...and sold. If you don't pay your fine, the court can issue a warrant to seize and sell your car and other possessions. When a warrant is issued, a court bailiff will visit your address to take possessions to sell. Bailiffs and Police can also seize or clamp your car. This can happen following a visit to your address, but also while your car is in use and parked away from your address. If you have committed traffic offences in someone else's car and the fines are not paid, their car could also be...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About fines

3. D K Rentals v TL [2022] NZDT 161 (30 September 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...it to be moved as he had fallen out with the occupant of that property. D&K removed the caravan to its yard and then, at TL’s instruction, to a section at [Address 2]. D&K left the caravan left behind a locked metal fence with a wheel clamp on it. 5. Rent was paid sporadically and then ceased. After many unsuccessful attempts to contact TL, in early June 2022, D&K went to collect the caravan. The caravan was not there and the lock on the metal fence was no longer ther...

4. SU v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 266 (25 May 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...fee for parking violations is “up to $200”, F Ltd said that fees over $100 are only charged for wrongful use of mobility spaces, whereas the initial fee charged to SU was $80. F Ltd pointed out that the statutory maximum fee chargeable by wheel clamping operators is $100 including GST.2 Although it would be clearer if the clause differentiated between mobility spaces and other violations, I find that neither the $200 maximum nor the $80 fee were disproportionate to F Ltd’s legitimate...

5. Director of Proceedings v Hurst [2019] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...table. 87. Contrary to accepted midwifery practice, the defendant failed to press the emergency call bell immediately when Baby N was born pale and floppy and making no respiratory effort, to obtain immediate neonatal assistance, and failed to clamp and cut the umbilical cord immediately to enable prompt neonatal resuscitation. Post-delivery - Baby N 88. After being transferred to the resuscitation table Baby N was given intermittent positive pressure ventilation via a Neopuff....

6. EA v UZ Ltd [2015] NZDT 889 (12 August 2015) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...credibility. He questioned whether the comments made by forum users should be believed because UZ Ltd had not been advised by UZU that there was any issue with the airbox. [12] EA demonstrated at the hearing how the design of the filter and clamps allows unfiltered air to enter the intake of the engine. The filter is not only too flexible but is not oiled. Under engine acceleration the air forced on the filter is such that the filter distorts and lets unfiltered air into the e...

7. Director of Proceedings v Zhu [2012] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...always accompanied by a support worker. When travelling any significant distance the aggrieved person travels in a specially adapted van. Once inside the van, the aggrieved person is unable to move the wheelchair without assistance, as the chair is clamped in place and the aggrieved person strapped into the chair. Events on 21 August 2009 10. On or about 21 August 2009 a neighbour of the Glendhu Road address (the neighbour), saw a van parked in the driveway of the Glendhu Road ad...

8. Recommendations recap - issue 4 [pdf, 832 KB]

   Recommendations recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 July–30 September 2012 ISSUE 4 O F N E W Z E A L A N D CHIEF CORONER O F F I C E O F T H E http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/coroners-court/ Coronial Services of New Zealand Purongo O te Ao Kakarauri justice.govt.nz/coroners To request a copy of any full findings of cases contained in this edition, please contact our National Office. National Office coronial.information@justice.govt.nz

9. TD v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 761 (31 October 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...It is not necessary to establish the existence of a contract for Q Ltd to claim the penalty fee. In the English Court of Appeal case of Arthur v Anker [1997] QB 564, the court held that a driver who knew the consequences of unauthorised parking (clamping) voluntarily accepted the consequences of his actions. In other words, the circumstances were covered by recognised tortious principles. Another example of a trespassing driver being dealt with under the law of tort is Jamieson’s T...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 10 Graeme’s Service Centre v Stalker [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...when the solicitor’s office reopened after the Christmas break. She believed that the Collections Unit would then allow the Court to consider the stay. However, on 22 January 2015, another bailiff attended the business premises and placed a clamp on a vehicle registered to the plaintiff. She had not referred to these issues in her previous affidavit, as she had not understood the importance that would be attached to them. She said that she genuinely believed that by dep...