Search Results

1. Shankar v Ahuja [2015] NZIACDT 36 (31 March 2015) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...September 2012; and in addition an application lodged under section 61 of the Immigration Act 2009 on 13 September 2012. The allegations are: [8.1] Mr Ahuja potentially failed to confirm in writing that the respective applications had been lodged, and clause 3(a) of the 2010 Code required him to do so. [8.2] He failed to provide ongoing timely updates in respect of the 11 September 2012 application, when Immigration New Zealand returned the application. The update was significant, as t...

2. AH v Secretary for Justice 17 August 2012 NZRA 000011 [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...application for review is as follows: a. A Parole Board Hearing is not an example that comes within the definition of a Category 3 proceeding. b. The Applicant did not demonstrate that he met the competence and experience requirements stipulated by clause 4(b) of the Schedule to the Legal Services (Quality Assurance) Regulations 2011 (the Regulations). Of the case examples that the Applicant provided, only one was at Criminal PC 3 or 4. The other case examples were at Criminal...

3. 2017 NZSSAA 012 (5 April 2017) [pdf, 95 KB]

   [2017] NZSSAA 012 Reference No. SSA 105/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Nelson against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at Nelson on 22 March 2017 Appearances For Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development: Ms J Hume (agent) The appellant: In person. Backgro

4. BORA Resource Legislation Amendment Bill [pdf, 436 KB]

   ...determination in respect of that person's rights, obligations, or interests protected or recognised by law.” 9. Observance of the "principles of natural justice" includes that all parties have the opportunity to be fairly heard.1 10. Clause 55 inserts subpart 5 after s 80 of the principal Act, which makes provision for a streamlined planning process. A local authority intending to prepare, change, or vary a policy statement or plan may apply to the responsible Min...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 013 Arthurs Point Outstanding Natural Landscape Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 755 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________ DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT _______________________________________________________________ Introduction [1] On 11 September 2019, Environment Judge Jackson issued decision [2019] NZEnvC 150 granting Arthurs Point Outstanding Natural Landscape Society Incorporated’s (‘the society’) application for enforcement orders under s314(f), 2 RMA.1 The decision concerned Queenstown Lakes District Council...

6. BORA Fisheries Act 1996 Amendment Bill [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...BILL WITH THE RIGHT TO NATURAL JUSTICE 4. Section 27(1) of the Bill of Rights Act provides that every person whose interests are affected by a decision by a public authority has the right to the observance of the principles of natural justice. 5. Clause 4 of the Bill amends current section 10(c) and (d) of the Fisheries Act 1996 by collapsing them into a single paragraph and expressly referring to sustainability rather than the purpose of the Fisheries Act 1996. Arguably, this clause ra...

7. Robson - Whitianga 9B1 (Tatawake Meeting house) Māori Reservation (2025) 329 Waiariki MB 217 (329 WAR 217) [pdf, 276 KB]

   329 Waiariki MB 217 Robson - Whitianga 9B1 (Tutawake Meeting House) Māori Reservation (2025) 329 Waiariki MB 217 (329 WAR 217) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000035624 WĀHANGA Under Section 239, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Whitianga 9B1 (Tutawake Meeting House) Māori Reservation I WAENGA I A Between MARGARET ROBSO

8. Falwasser v Olsen - Matata Parish 6A (2014) 107 Waiariki MB 74 (107 WAR 74) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...himself as responsible trustees. With regard to the lease, he says that there has been a long process, of negotiations (over 12 months), with WDC. Mr Olson says that the trustees have the authority and are empowered to enter into the lease as per clause 4(b) xv of the Trust order. Further, the trustees while not being obliged to inform the beneficial owners prior to exercising their trustee powers to enter into the lease have undertaken a number of hui and attended community cons...

9. JZ v [Place] Standards Committee [X] LCRO 123/2014 (16 December 2016) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...security from an associated person and the disclosure required before an associated person can be a guarantor or indemnifier: (e) default procedures: (f) the restrictions relating to advancing moneys on the security of development mortgages. (2) Subclause (3) applies if a lawyer is instructed to apply money under a loan agreement on behalf of a lender under that agreement, and— (a) the lender has specified the borrower to whom the money is to be lent; and (b) the lender has not...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 03 – MT v Murthy (11 January 2024) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...to ensure Erik Murthy’s name and licence number were written in the service contract, in breach of cl 19(a). (2) Failed to include payment terms and conditions in the service contract, in breach of cl 19(i). (3) Failed to ensure the refund clause in the service contract complied with the Code, in breach of cl 24(a). (4) Failed to recognize that the advance payment: (i) remained the property of the complainant until payable and invoiced, in breach of cl 25(a); (ii) should be...