Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 23 Metallic Sweeping (1998) Ltd v Whitehead [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...[3] Following receipt of the memorandum of submissions in support of costs from Metallic, and in view of the indication from Mr Whitehead’s solicitors, the Authority accordingly went ahead and issued a determination on costs dated 25 May 2009 (AA 6A/09). The Authority, while acknowledging that the respondent employer had good prospects of success on costs, declined to make an order in its favour. The reason for this was that the Authority Member was of the view that th

2. Hiroti - Estate of Parahi Hhiroti [2016] Chief Judges MB 711 (2016 CJ 711) [pdf, 245 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 699 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20110003163 CJ 2011/38 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Parahi Hiroti also known as Joe Hiroti or Joseph Parahi Hiroti BETWEEN MELISSA JOSEPHINE KATARINA HIROTI Applicant Date: 10 August 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC

3. [2018] NZEmpC 129 Secretary for Justice, MOJ v NZ PSA [pdf, 266 KB]

   SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE v NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 129 [5 November 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 129 EMPC 339/2018 IN THE MATTER OF applications for injunctions AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an interim injunction BETWEEN SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Plaintiff AND NEW

4. [2024] NZIACDT 14 – SC v Murthy (23 April 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (the IPT) was dismissed on 30 November 2020.1 His claim was found not to be credible. A second refugee claim was refused on 30 June 2022 and an appeal to the IPT was dismissed on 22 September 2022.2 [5] Meanwhile, on 24 August 2022, the complainant had been granted a work visa, expiring on 24 August 2023. [6] The complainant then approached Ms Murthy. On 1 November 2022, they met. Later that day she sent him a summary of their discus...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 197 Otago Regional Council v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 982 KB]

   ...the Act BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2018-CHC-290) Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Sitting alone under s279 of the Act Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Last case event: 15 August 2024 Date of Decision: 21 August 2024 Date of Issue: 21 August 2024 _______________________________________________________________ DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT __________________________________________________________...

6. 2021-02-19 Tom de Pelsemaeker - Reply - Planning - Recommended decisions on submissions (19 Feb 2021) [pdf, 2 MB]

   Provision ORC submission Number Submitter ID Submission Point ID Further Submitter ID Name Support / Oppose Decision requested (see submission for reasons) Officer recommendation All Plan Change 7 70013 70013.01 Aepurist International Not stated An efficient, effective and fair regulatory framework that provides for greater security for the Otago Region and horticulture An Objective, Policies and methods for an interim framework that provides for longer term (20 year) r

7. [2007] NZEmpC AC 26/07 Eastern Equities Corp Ltd t/a Farmers Transport Ltd v Bright [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...sets out a process with vertical flow charts as to how poor performance leading to final dismissal is to be managed. [36] In the case of Mr Bright, his own employment contract contained a provision relating to performance appraisals. Clause 14 of the contract reads as follows: 14. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL The Employer reserves the right to regularly conduct an appraisal of the Employee’s work skills, attitudes and habits. This appraisal, although it will form the basi...

8. Horowhenua: The Muaūpoko Priority Report [pdf, 8.4 MB]

   H O R O W H E N U A Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 7 W A I 2 2 0 0 H O R O W H E N U A The M uaūpoko Priority Report P r

9. [2016] NZEnvC 140 South Epsom Planning Group Inc & Three Kings United Group Inc v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...remaining requirements identified in Appealing Wanaka, namely the statutory documents and s 32 RMA. We address these as separate topics in their own right. Regional policy documents . [24] PC372 is a request for a plan change under Schedule 1 RMA, clauses 21-29. Pursuant to clause 25 the Council concluded that it would accept the request (clause 25(2)(b)) and notified it. Accordingly the South Epsom Planning Group & Three Kings United Group & Anor v Auckland Council (Inter...

10. E73 Prof David Williams - EIC - Ngāti Whātua Orākei [pdf, 5.6 MB]

    ...PROFESSOR DAVID VERNON WILLIAMS ON BEHALF OF: (A) NGĀTI WHĀTUA ORĀKEI WHAIA MAIA LTD; (B) SUPPORTING MANA WHENUA Rob Enright Barrister Magdalene Chambers Level 1, 28 Customs St East Britomart Auckland m: 021 2765787 e: rob@publiclaw9.com 2227 mailto:rob@publiclaw9.com 2 INTRODUCTION I, David Vernon Williams of Auckland, Professor, state: 1 I am a Professor of Law at the University of Auckland. Background and expertise 2 I am...