5995 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 52 Reference No: READT 014/2021 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN QH Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2103) First Respondent AND KE and SE Second Respondents AND [Real Estate Agency] Third Respondent Hearing on the papers Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) G Denley (Member) C Sandelin (Member)
...Rehabilitation – Attendant Care; Laundry Services Schedule 1, cl 14 and cl 17 Accident Compensation Act 2001] _____________________________________________________________________ [1] This is an appeal against a decision of the respondent of 25 June 2013 approving attendant care at level one for personal needs at 97.5 hours a week; home help at 14.5 hours per week; and sleepover care 56 hours per week; and a decision dated 25 June 2013 declining ongoing funding for external lau...
Legal Aid Services Grants Handbook June 2025 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind
...[2] The Applicants are mostly neighbours of the quarry operated by or on behalf of entities associated with the Respondents at Papanui Inlet Road, Otago Peninsula. [3] The thrust of the application for enforcement orders, amended as recently as 5 July 2018, is that: Respondents cease any quarrying or excavation or any other quarry related activity outside the boundaries/permitted area for such quarrying and related activity on the land described in Unique Identifier 207075 (Otago Lan...
...Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to cl 14 of Schedule 1 to the Act WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2015-AKL-000127) Appellant BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent PORT BLAKELY LIMITED, CARRUS CORPORATION LIMITED, TKC HOLDINGS LIMITED, NGATI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST and MATAKANA HAPO Section 274 parties Environment Judge D Ki...
Legal Aid Services Grants Handbook June 2025 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any ki
...fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. Published by the Ministry of Justice 2016 © Crown Copyright Ministry of Justice The Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10125, Wellington, New Zealand T +64 4 918 8800 F +64 4 918 8820 E info@justice.govt.nz W www.justice.govt.nz http://www.justice.govt.nz/ iii Contents Contents iii Legal Services Act 2011 6 Transitional policy and procedures 6...
Legal Aid Services Grants Handbook July 2025 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any ki
...Given the complexity of the system, I consider that a reasonable minimum frequency for checking of the system should be once every six months, although it may be that the manufacturer recommends more frequent servicing. Given the requirement under clause 101 for a written maintenance contract, I consider that the contract may in fact require more frequent inspections. Accordingly, I conclude the proposal by the Council is reasonable in the circumstances, and largely not a matter of di...
SECOND STAR LTD v QLDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 129 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN SECOND STAR LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-52) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner M C G Mabin Hearing: at Queenstown on 4 and 5 March 2024 Site v