18170 items matching your search terms
...IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove matter to the Employment Court AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for costs BETWEEN ELENA KAZEMI Plaintiff AND RIGHTWAY LIMITED First Defendant AND EDWIN FREDERICK SHAND READ Second Defendant AND GREGORY MICHAEL SHEEHAN Third Defendant AND DARRYL DEVENDRA...
...2023 Submissions: A Lake for herself B Magill for Auckland Council Date of Decision: 19 April 2024 Date of Issue: 19 April 2024 _________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AS TO COSTS _________________________________________________________________ A: The application for costs is granted. B: Under s 285 of the RMA the Environment Court awards Ms Lake costs of $1,563.75 against Auckland Council. 2 REA...
...Azucena, agent for first to third plaintiffs and on his own behalf as fourth plaintiff J Wood, advocate for defendant Judgment: 5 December 2025 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] The plaintiffs have challenged a costs determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 In order to understand the grounds for the challenge, and the 1 Satija v Epiphany Donuts Newtown Ltd [2024] NZERA 727. defendant’s opposition to it, it is necessa...
...NZEmpC 75 [16 June 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 75 EMPC 141/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN MOBEEN BHIKOO Plaintiff AND STEPHEN MARR HAIR DESIGN NEWMARKET LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 3 and 30 May 2016 Appearances: P Pa'u and J Lewis, advocates for pl...
...identified before setting fees. The Crown cannot levy a tax without the explicit authority of Parliament; therefore a fee can only recover, at most, the cost of a service provided. In most instances setting court and tribunal fees to fully recover costs will not be appropriate because of access to justice considerations. These points and other comments on fee-setting have been made by the Regulations Review Committee in the context of scrutinising fee regulations and have informed the...
...CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 120 EMPC 413/2019 EMPC 444/2019 IN THE MATTER OF matters removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN SMITHS CITY (SOUTHERN) LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Plaintiff AND JEREMY WALTER ETTLES CLAXTON First Defendant AND CANDO CREATIVE FLOORING LIMITED Second Defendant AND CANDO CREATI...
...NGAWAPURUA AND RUA ROA TRUSTS Respondents Hearing: 4 April 2012, 15 Takitimu MB 204 - 221 - Oral Judgment 29 November 2017, 175 Waiariki MB 142-143 - Direction Judgment: 4 May 2018 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD AS TO COSTS Copies to: J Appleby, Wilson McKay Solicitors, DX CP33019, Auckland L Watson, 342 Gloucester Street, Taradale Napier 4112 N Milner, Kahui Legal PO Box 1645 Wellington 6140 S Webster, Sainsbury Log...
On this page: Awarding costs and disbursements What can you claim? Appealing a costs order Security for costs Awarding costs and disbursements In this section, ‘costs’ refers to the expense of hiring a lawyer. ‘Disbursements’ refers to the expenses you incur in taking the proceeding (other than the lawyer’s fees), for example, the court filing fees and witness expenses. After a judgment is delivered the Judge may: order the unsuccessful party to pay the costs and/or disbursements o...
...NZEmpC 39 [15 April 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 39 WRC 5/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN EMMA YUEN SEE FOX Plaintiff AND HEREWORTH SCHOOL TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda filed on 16 February, 13 and 29 March, and 7 and 13 April 2016 Appearances: D Traylor, counse...
...By memoranda of submissions filed on 15 April 2013 and 6 May 2013 Appearances: Chris Patterson and Andrea Halloran, counsel for plaintiff John Hannan and Lauren Simpson, counsel for defendant Judgment: 9 July 2013 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] In my substantive judgment of 14 March 2013, 1 I dismissed the plaintiff’s challenge to the Employment Relations Authority’s determination. 2 Costs were reserved. The parties have been...