Search Results

1. Maori Incorporations Factsheet.pdf [pdf, 370 KB]

   ...weekdays. You don’t need to make an appointment. Contact details follow or go online to maorilandcourt.govt.nz/contact-us Taitokerau District Level 3, Manaia House Rathbone Street, Whangārei 0110 DX Box AX10086, Whangārei Phone 09 983 9940 Email mlctaitokerau@justice.govt.nz Auckland Information Office Ground floor, Building B 65B Main Highway, Ellerslie Auckland 1051 DX Box EX10912, Auckland Phone 09 279 5850 Email mlctamakimakaurau@justice.govt.nz Waikato- Maniapoto District...

2. Puohotaua v Paranihi - Rakato and Part Rakato B Maori Reservation (2024) 487 Aotea MB 53 [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...Court file, making it difficult to decipher what financials are for which trust (the Reservation Trust and the Ahu Whenua Trust) due to the use of the same bank account. (b) That Ms Puohotaua did not receive the financial information that was emailed back in 2019 as stated in the AGM minutes. (c) That Reti Cribb was the treasurer of the Ahu Whenua Trust, but she never moved the financial information at the AGM held in 2019, Teresa Ranginui did. (d) Ms Puohotaua claims that th...

3. L v O [2015] NZIACDT 81 (14 August 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...professional fees. [6.8] The adviser submitted a work visa application. On 31 July 2013, Immigration New Zealand sent a verification questionnaire to the adviser. On 16 August 2013 she completed it, stating that her first contact with the complainant was by email on 14 June 2013. [6.9] On 18 September 2013, Immigration New Zealand emailed the adviser saying the offer of employment did not appear to be genuine or sustainable. She provided a response. [6.10] Immigration New Zealand decl...

4. LQ Burgess 28 June 2014 NZSHD 9 [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...in writing explaining why she should not be disqualified from holding a certificate. This two week period would expire on 17 June 2014. [19] As there had been no response from the applicant by 13 June 2014 an Authority case manager sent a repeat email containing the information about the Waiver of disqualification to the applicant. [20] On 19 June 2014 the case manager tried to contact the applicant on both her supplied phone numbers without success and sent a follow-up email to her...

5. YC v LV LCRO 57/2013 (16 April 2015) [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...breaches of the lease with [Company X], and a caveat had been lodged to prevent the transaction settling. [10] He also complains that Mr LV took some weeks to respond to a letter he personally delivered to Mr LV’s mailbox, followed up by an email, in which he raised objections to Mrs TG taking up the lease. Standards Committee [11] The Committee considered Mr YC’s complaint, and Mr LV’s replies to the issues raised. The Committee was unconcerned about any conflict of in...

6. [2018] NZEmpC 51 Kocatürk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...and Mrs Kocatürk were not 5 Kocatürk v Zara’s Turkish Ltd, above n 1, at [5]. disadvantaged by their difficulty in understanding English because of this assistance. She produced an email dated 1 September 2017, from the Authority’s Support Officer who sent a copy of the determination to counsel then acting for Zara’s Turkish and the person described as a representative. The email unambiguously referred to the 28-day...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 206 Awesome Art Ltd v Milne [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...time limit expired. [20] I am not persuaded by Awesome Art’s explanations. Determinations are accompanied by information about the right to elect to challenge within 28 days. That information was relayed to the company as is evident from emails Ms Jarrett sent and received referring to it. On 12 June 2020, four days after the determination was delivered, she sent an email to an Authority support officer asking for information about the exceptional circumstances referred to....

8. IJ v K U Ltd [2020] NZDT 1549 (10 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...& U Ltd, through its employee [K & U Ltd employee 1], told her an RPZ valve was not required and all she needed was a $40 vacuum breaker from Mico. She states [K & U Ltd employee 1] was fully involved in the consent process and IJ provided emails to support this assertion. IJ states subsequently [K & U Ltd employee 2] took over from [K & U Ltd employee 1] and he too was adamant that it was a mistake by Council and a vacuum breaker was acceptable to [Council]. IJ provide...

9. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - Easy Read [docx, 9.6 MB]

   ...proposals. [image: ] What you tell us will be used by the government when they decide what to do. You have until 6 August 2021 to have your say about hate speech. [image: ]You can tell us what you think by: · doing an online submission · writing or emailing us your submission [image: Computer 2]Online means using the internet to do things like: · looking at websites · sending emails. [image: ] A submission is when you write down what you think of our proposals. [image: ]You c...

10. NQ v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 651 (21 August 2024) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...time. They say the lead time is usually 3 months because, for example, they have to cut the boards to specifications. 9. I am not convinced of the lead time on the boards. The delays appear to be from C Limited’s end. I note on 14 November in an email from M at C Limited he apologised for the tardy reply and that says “a communication breakdown here has meant that it has not been actioned in a timely manner. We will have an answer for you by the days end.” They did respond the sa...