9620 items matching your search terms
...NZDT 386 APPLICANT VH Ltd RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: 1. KI is not liable to pay the sum of $13801.15 to VH Ltd. 2. VH Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business comprise (BEC) fraud. In September-October 2023 VH Ltd carried out landscaping work on KI’s property. 2. On 4 October 2023 VH Ltd sent KI an invoice for $13801.15 for the final payment of the...
...other mail. You can use an NZ Post mail box. If you use a DX mail box your mail will get to us faster Northland/Auckland (covers Rodney County down to the bottom of Franklin County) Auckland Land Valuation Tribunal DX: CX10086AucklandPhone: 09 916 9091Email: EnvironmentCourt@justice.govt.nz Whangarei Land Valuation Tribunal (covers North Auckland)DX: CX10086AucklandPhone: 09 916 9091Email: EnvironmentCourt@justice.govt.nz Waikato/Bay of Plenty Hamilton Land Valuation Tribunal (covers Waikato, H...
...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 482 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is to pay the sum of $10,863.00 to B Ltd on or before 31 May 2024. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises apparently as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business email compromise (BEC) fraud. On 14 August 2023, B Ltd issued an invoice to M Ltd for $24,725.00 for demolition work, due on 28 August. The invoice was emailed to M Ltd via [accounting software...
...notice of solicitor acting in the Court. On 19 January, she went to the Family Court to search its files for additional records the applicant did not hold. She then took her 10 days’ leave. [7] The day after her return, the respondent had an email exchange with the applicant about various shared care issues to consider in preparation for a round table meeting the following day. On 1 February 2023, the round table meeting resulted in signature of a consent memorandum and in due cou...
...the part of Ms PT (the report). The Committee requested information from Ms PT, considered the report and the information Ms PT had provided, and formed the view that Ms PT’s conduct in respect of one of those matters – sending herself an email attaching confidential information – would be regarded as unacceptable by lawyers of good standing. A finding of unsatisfactory conduct was made. The Committee ordered Ms PT to pay a fine and costs pursuant to s 156 of the Act....
...pipe to the driveway side on the northern boundary (Option 2) or locating it behind a retaining wall the applicant intended to build adjacent to the southern boundary (Option 3). [6] On 20 March 2020, the Council engineer sent the applicant an email which the applicant later considered to be of considerable significance in relation to the ultimate permanent location of the pipe. The email referred to a sketch plan the engineer was to deliver to the applicant. In summary, the pla...
...employ, annexing correspondence between the DoHRP and the lawyers representing the Commissioner. That correspondence spans the period from 5 August 2019 to 29 January 2020. [6] The purpose of the application is to gain access to Police internal emails. [7] The Commissioner is opposed to the application. On 22 July 2020 a particularised notice of opposition was filed together with detailed submissions and an affidavit sworn by Mr Steven Whooley, an engineer within the Technical Support...
...acceptable professional standards. [24] In a work place setting there is a risk that others might have access to an individual’s email address, e.g. a manager, a co-worker or personal assistant. Most organisations have policies concerning private emails or access by others in the organisation, but seldom would emails be wholly inaccessible by someone other than the intended recipient. In this case there is no suggestion that anyone other than the Applicant actually accessed the...
...licensed salesperson and was first licensed in April 2024. She was required to complete 10 hours of CPD, including two mandatory topics, by 31 December 2024. [5] On 13 November 2024, the Real Estate Agents Authority wrote to the Applicant by email to notify her that she must complete her CPD by 31 December 2024. The email advised the Applicant that the Registrar’s records showed that she had not completed the required CPD and she did not have an exemption. The Authority set out...
...Counsel: B Buckett, counsel for the plaintiff M Edwards, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 8 March 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] An admissibility issue arises with regard to an email which the plaintiff, Mr Craig Tulloch, submits contains confidential and without prejudice information arising from a mediation which took place between him and Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Hays). [2] This issu...