Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7496 items matching your search terms

  1. Funding Matrix - High Court - MACA Applicants [pdf, 363 KB]

    ...$156,750.00 $202,750.00 $260,250 $316,750.00 *Note: a voluntary step that may be undertaken - to establish that the applicant/representative has the authority to represent the applicant group. This may have taken place before the application was filed or it may take place after the application has been filed – funding can still be accessed should real costs be incurred related to appointment at a later stage.

  2. How to make a claim

    ...less, a copy of MBIE's lower-value claim dispute resolution certificate particulars of claim filing fee of $408.89. Read a glossary of the common terms used in the Weathertight Homes Tribunal How much does it cost It costs $408.89 (including GST) to file an application. Find out how to pay

  3. NN v OD v Z Ltd [2024] NZDT 797 (27 November 2024) [pdf, 274 KB]

    ...response or have been advised that the insurance company has not finalised the matter yet. 10. The applicants are seeking $6,322.50 which consists of $4,900.00 taken for the excess, $122.50 credit card surcharge, $234.00 for the Disputes Tribunal filing fee and the balance to cover time spent trying to resolve the matter and interest. 11. There was no attendance at the hearing by Z Ltd. Z Ltd had indicated prior to the hearing that “Given the current busy season and the demand...

  4. Zhang & Cao v Chen [2019] NZIACDT 11 (1 March 2019) [pdf, 150 KB]

    ...Zhang & Cao v Chen [2018] NZIACDT 47. The Tribunal found that Ms Chen, a licensed immigration adviser, was incompetent in the way she dealt with the complainants and that she breached cl 20(a) of the Code of Conduct 2014 (the Code) in charging fees to which she was not entitled. [2] The decision of 16 November 2018 had followed an interim decision in Zhang & Cao v Chen [2018] NZIACDT 11 issued on 5 April 2018 and then a Minute issued on 19 June 2018. BACKGROUND [3] The...

  5. Shankar v Ahuja [2015] NZIACDT 106 (21 December 2015) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...complaints the Tribunal upheld against Mr Ahuja, the respective grounds for the complaints the Tribunal upheld were: [1.1] In Chand v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 119 (IACDT 012/13) the Tribunal upheld the complaint on the basis Mr Ahuja failed to refund fees of $2,288.50, when the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code) required him to do so. [1.2] In Kumar v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 120 (IACDT 013/13), the Tribunal has upheld the complaint on the basis Mr Ahuja failed...

  6. Wu v Manukau City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 65 [pdf, 77 KB]

    ...Respondent AND RRL GROUP LIMITED Third Respondent AND BERNARD DUFFY Fourth Respondent Decision: 7 December 2011 FINAL DETERMINATION Adjudicator: S Pezaro Page | 2 Background [1] Liang-Yuan Wu and Ling- Yu Kao Wu filed an application for adjudication on 17 June 2009. The claim was originally against the first, second and third respondents and the fourth respondent was joined on 3 September 2009. All parties attended mediation on 9 December 20...

  7. Khan v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 2 (15 January 2014) [pdf, 77 KB]

    ...“clerical work”, which can be carried out by a person who is not licensed, is narrow. [15.5] A licensed immigration adviser is personally responsible for all aspects of a client engagement, and will be personally responsible for the refund of fees, compensation, and the like. [15.6] A corporate body cannot hold a licence as an immigration adviser. [16] The material before the Tribunal points to a potential finding that the adviser has, in effect, put her status as a licensed immig...

  8. Deputy Registrar – Lot 1 DP 2811 (2013) 18 Te Waipounamu MB 287 (18 TWP 287) [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...by the Court or other duly-constituted authority as aforesaid. [17] The Native Land Act 1909 further defined the different categories of land. ‘European land’ is “any land which has been alienated from the Crown for a subsisting estate in fee simple, other than Native land”. ‘Customary land’ is “land which, being vested in the Crown, is held by the Natives or the descendants of Natives under the customs or usages of the Māori people”. ‘Native land’ is defined...

  9. Rihari v Auckland -Takou Trust Ahu Whenua Trust (2020) 220 Taitokerau MB 136 (220 TTK 136) [pdf, 227 KB]

    ...issues raised in the application and to respond to the application as required by my directions. The trustees advised that this meeting was time consuming and complex. As such, they passed a resolution approving a one-off payment of a trustee fee at $25.00 per trustee per hour for the eight-hour meeting. This comes to a total of $200.00 per trustee. Six of the seven trustees were present at the meeting resulting in a total cost of $1,200.00. [29] Clause 17 of the trust order pr...

  10. IN v SU [2021] NZDT 1652 (12 July 2021) [pdf, 161 KB]

    ...account, SU owes IN $2,450.00 being the difference between what he had agreed to pay for the car and the cost of getting another similar car If so, does SU owe IN the $90.00 Disputes Tribunal fee? 36. The Tribunal has no ability to refund the filing fee. This claim is dismissed. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 12/07/2021 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decis...