Search Results

1. LCRO 178/2015 EN v FO (19 November 2018) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms EN has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to take no further action in respect of her complaint concerning Ms FO’s fees and her conduct. Background [2] Ms EN says that she and her husband instructed Ms FO in relation to three or four separate matters on the basis that Ms FO’s hourly rate was $350. [3] On 5, 12 and 18 June 2015 Ms FO issued invoices...

2. LCRO 228/2016 SP v QH (27 June 2019) [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms SP has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area]] Standards Committee 2 (the Committee) that made unsatisfactory conduct findings against her on account of her: (a) undue delay in releasing files and documents to new lawyers engaged by Mr QH and his family trust; and (b) failure to render a bill of costs within a reasonable time after a matter’s conclusion. Background [2] The background was that: 2 (a) Ms SP ha...

3. LCRO 75/2022 BG v HC (25 October 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...HC in which he advised that: (a) it had come to his attention that HC had been discussing her employment case with a number of people; and (b) he was concerned that HC was disseminating inaccurate information about both his conduct and the fees charged; and (c) he would consider instigating proceedings, if he continued to receive feedback which suggested that HC was continuing to make adverse comments about his conduct. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [10]...

4. Form 42a Civil Victims Order [pdf, 246 KB]

   Version 20 – January 2023 page 1 01/23 form 42a Tax Invoice Civil Legal Aid Fixed Fees Victims' Orders against Violent Offenders (Applicant & Respondent) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from...

5. Protection-of-Personal-and-Property-Rights_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 713 KB]

   ...6rfh54cgzi 2024-09-04 14:24:47 [IN-CONFIDENCE] Office of the Minister of Justice Social Outcomes Committee Updating the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act property thresholds and Public Trust’s Private Manager Examination fee Proposal 1 This paper seeks Cabinet’s agreement to amend the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 (PPPR Act) and Protection of Personal and Property Rights Regulations 1988 (PPPR Regulations) to: 1.1 Update the fee Pub...

6. Form 27A Fixed Fees J [pdf, 292 KB]

   Templates V15 – July 2018 page 1 07/18 form 27a Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule J Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type High Court Court of Appeal Parole Board Court location Details of cla...

7. Form 28B Criminal legal aid Fixed Fee and Fixed Fee Plus [pdf, 594 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 28b Amendment to Grant Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees/Fixed Fees Plus Cases Legal aid file no. Lead provider’s matter/file no. Charges/CRNs Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Applicable fee schedule A-C D E F G H-I J Court location Amendment sought in relation to Fixed fees/Fixed fees plus cases (start at A below) Estimate* (start at C below) Dis...

8. EO v UO & U Ltd [2023] NZDT 257 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...U Ltd and sought $17,286.00 from UO and LO and U Ltd, being $17,066.00 for reimbursement of what was awarded against her by the Tribunal on 7 March 2022 in Ms L’s claim against her, $40.00 for the WOF fee and $180.00 for reimbursement of the filing fee. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 Should the warrant of fitness have been issued? 5. During the hearing, UO and LO acknowledged that the WOF should not have been issued for the van on 9 June 2020. What losses, if any,...

9. LCRO 100/2020 FT v D and O CM (9 June 2020) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...Committee’s decision is presumed to have occurred on the fifth working day after it is made, given or performed or exercised.1 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, s 198(b). 2 [5] In order to comply with the statutory timeframe prescribed for filing a review application, Mr FT was required to file his review application on or before 5 PM on Wednesday 27 May 2020. [6] Mr FT’s application was clearly filed out of time. [7] The approach historically adopted by Legal Compl...

10. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v TCLEA-T7364885 [2013] NZCOP 17 [pdf, 382 KB]

    ...Tribunal and listed the 11 infringements for which it sought relief. I shall deal with those submissions below. [16] RIANZ sought financial recovery of $3292.54, comprised as follows: (1) compensation for lost sales (11 x $2.39) $26.29 (2) Fees paid to the IPAP (11 x $28.75) $316.25 (3) Fees paid to the Tribunal $200.00 (4) A deterrent sum (11 x $250) $2750.00 Proceedings issued [17] On 24 May 2013 the Tribunal issued notice of the proceedings against the respondent,...