Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 167 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 331 KB]

   ...claim was that the Authority’s minute, and the seven determinations, were made “without original jurisdiction” and in breach of Mr Halse’s “right to justice”. Claims were made that the Authority had no power to deal with the proceeding filed by the Trust, because the dispute did not arise from an employment agreement or relationship, that the Authority had no power to make “non- identification” orders, or to enforce a contract between Mr Halse’s former client and t...

2. Deputy Registrar - Orongotea B No 1 (2008) 127 Whangarei MB 18 (127 WH 18) [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...[3] The Chief Registrar has advised that the MLIS system is not able to automatically identify instances where orders have been transmitted to LINZ and that the task would need to be undertaken manually and would involve opening up to 10,000 files and perhaps 20,000 orders (this is for the previous 10 year period). Instead, the Registrar-General of Land has provided a spreadsheet detailing orders received from the Maori Land Court in Whangarei since Landonline was introduced in 20...

3. Love v Samuel and Sharon Gemmell Whanau Trust - Anatohia Section 90C Block XVIII Gore SD [2016] Chief Judge's MB 122 (2016 CJ 122) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...the making of the consolidated order that is the subject of challenge by this application. [31] Secondly, whether there is an interest in the woolshed remains to be determined but not by way of a s 45 application. Rather that should be done by filing a s 18 application in the Māori Land Court and by reference to the correct title to the block. There is no need to adjourn this application to enable that process to occur. [32] The latest submissions of counsel for the applicant seeki...

4. Edwards - Succession to Ngarangi Kanoa Babbington [2021] Chief Judge's MB 755 (2021 CJ 755) [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA ISAAC Judgment of Chief WW Isaac 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 756 Hei timatanga kōrero - Introduction [1] On 13 September 2019, Maryanne Georgina Edwards and Aidan Jonathan Austyne Edwards filed this application pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). [2] The applicants seek to amend the succession order made at 151 Aotea MB 79- 82 on 18 March 2005. The order relates to the estate of Ngarangi...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 131 Boyd v OJI [pdf, 363 KB]

   ...automatically operate as a stay of the determination. She explained that a challenge to the Employment Court would not automatically mean that Mr Boyd would not have to pay the sums ordered by the Authority. Ms Fechney also said that if a challenge was filed at the Employment Court and an application for stay was made, the most likely outcome would be that Mr Boyd would have to pay the sums of money to either OJI or to the Employment Court’s bank account. Second deter...

6. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

7. Firmin v ACC [2013] NZACA 15 [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...right of appeal against the review decision and then abandoned the appeal. [7] In May 2010, the strike out application was adjourned by consent so that Mr Firmin could apply to the Authority for leave to reinstate the withdrawn appeal and/or to file a late appeal in respect of the review decision of 7 August 2005. In the event the application to the Authority failed, the parties agreed that both applications would be heard together and the strike out application would be incorporated i...

8. LCRO 73/2024 OR v SV (3 September 2024) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...same as the events giving rise to a separate complaint made against the respondent’s employer and a consequent review application by her. I was the review officer who determined that review application. [3] The materials on that separate review file provided more comprehensive factual background than is available from the materials available to me on the file for this review application. Consequently, I take the liberty of repeating much of the factual background 2 from my dec...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 079 Maungaharuru-Tangitū Trust v Hastings District Council [pdf, 19 MB]

   ...streams and lakes, this section applies to the protection of those rivers, streams and lakes that are Waahi Tapu or Waahi Wāhi Taonga. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Financial incentives including rates relief, waiving or refund of consent application fees will be utilised to encourage protection of cultural heritage including Waahi Tapu, Waahi Wāhi Taonga and sites of significance where appropriate. This recognises land owners and developers who provide for the protection of Waahi...

10. [2007] NZEmpC AC 5A/07 Ali'imatafitafi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...determination and elected to have a full hearing of the whole matter. [2] The plaintiff raised his personal grievance alleging an unjustified dismissal on 19 February 2003 and mediation later that year did not settle the grievance. The plaintiff filed a statement of problem in the Employment Relations Authority on 12 December 2005 and an investigation meeting took place on 29 May 2006. The Authority issued its determination on 15 June 2006. [3] The Employment Court h...