Search Results

1. MLC - 05 Rule 5-11 schedule notification [pdf, 1 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 May 2016 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 May 2016, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori Appell

2. Waitangi Tribunal - District 13 Part 1 Northern South Island [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 13 THE NORTHERN SOUTH ISLAND DR G A PHILLIPSON JUNE 1995 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District I: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District IIA: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith THE AUTHOR My name is Grant Phillipson and I completed a B.A. Hons. in histo

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000207 Mason v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   ...served with a copy of this notice. PART B - APPLICATION FOR WAIVERS I DIRECTIONS 1. The appellants apply for the following waivers and directions in respect of service of the Notice of Appeal, the operation of section 274 of the RMA, and the filing and service of any further Court documents relating to the appeal: (a) Service of the Notice of Appeal (i) A waiver of the usual requirement in clause 14(5) of Schedule 1 to the RMA, regulation 7( 1 )( c) and Form 7 of the Resource Ma...

4. Dawson v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Wellington 36 [pdf, 242 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000043 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 36 BETWEEN ANTHONY AND ANGELA DAWSON Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (formerly known as NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND OSBORNE PRICE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Second Respondent AND MARK AND JOANN-LEE FULLER Third Respondents AND GREG PAUL THOMAS (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND IAN BLACK Fifth Respondent AND BARNEY CORNAGA Sixth Respond

5. [2022] NZEnvC 051 Perjuli Developments Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 14 MB]

   Perjuli Developments Limited v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 051 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND cancellation of the resource consent under s 132(4) subsection 3 of the Act BETWEEN PERJULI DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-25) Appellant/Consent Holder AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Commissioner S Myers

6. Fehling v South Westland Area School [2012] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...“the system” have been less successful. Every lack of success has, in turn, added to Mr Fehling’s feeling of injustice and a belief that “the system” is either not functioning correctly or is protecting itself. One outcome has been the filing in these proceedings of a statement of claim which, rather than directing itself at the absence of evidence to justify the withholding grounds relied on by the School, unwisely broadens the attack to 3 include (inter alia) a challen...

7. Clearwater Cove Apartments Body Corporate 170989 v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 39 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...a Code Compliance Certificate were carried out by the Council and an Interim Code Compliance Certificate (ICCC) was issued on 2 April 1996. No final Code Compliance Certificate has been issued. PARTIES [7] This claim was originally filed on 18 April 2008 by 14 unit owners against the Council as first respondent and Fletcher‘s as second respondent. The owner of Unit 16R, John Garea, and the owner of Unit 2B, Petil Holdings Limited, filed individual claims under the...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 161 Rush Security Services Limited v Coverdale [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...the Authority’s compensation award of $3,000, compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act is confirmed in that sum. [40] The defendant is entitled to costs and disbursements. If agreement cannot be reached on this issue then Mr Blair is to file a memorandum within 21 days and Ms Rush will have a like time in which to respond. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 12.30 pm on 5 December 2011

9. [2009] NZEmpC WC 5/09 McCain Foods (NZ) Ltd v Services and Food Workers Union [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...[72] I note that the Employment Relations Authority reserved costs on the union’s application to it. All questions of costs should now be dealt with by this Court. If either party seeks an order, application should be made by memorandum filed and served within 1 month of this judgment with the respondent to it having a further 2 weeks to reply by memorandum. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 2.30 pm on 8th April 2009

10. Building a return on investment capability in the Justice sector [pdf, 652 KB]

    ...return from supporting someone off benefit and into employment. 61. In general, no such relationship exists in the justice sector. There is mostly no direct link between volumes and costs, except in some limited areas such as legal aid and juror fees, for example. Even if an intervention successfully reduces the amount of crime in society, a fiscal saving will typically only result if subsequent decisions are taken to close facilities, reduce the workforce, or otherwise reduce costs....