UK v VL LCRO 142/2013 (2 September 2016) [pdf, 257 KB]
...instead of attacking him and thereby de minimis breached rule 2.8 (and possibly 2 in bickering publicly in the media and also possibly 10 in their own use of intemperate language). I look forward to hearing from you. [6] NZLS made up a separate file, each with its own file number, for each of the f lawyers to whom the complaint related. Redaction and Unpublished LCRO decisions [7] Mr [UK] took issue with NZLS’s handling of unpublished Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) decisio...