Search Results

Search results for filing fees.

7482 items matching your search terms

  1. Final Report of the Independent Panel - Word [docx, 11 MB]

    Te Korowai Ture ā-Whānau: The final report of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms. May 2019 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the informat

  2. Te Korowai Ture ā-Whānau: The final report of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    Te Korowai Ture ā-Whānau: The final report of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms. May 2019 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to

  3. [2011] NZEmpC 48 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...dismissal until she was finally given a medical clearance to return to work in March 2008. Both periods are affected by any calculation of contingencies which relate to what would have occurred if Ms Clear had been in the workplace. Mr Hammond has filed a memorandum showing calculations, which I understand are accepted by Mr Bevan, recording the total loss (less actual received) as being $252,773.63. [50] For his part, Mr Bevan submitted that any award for economic loss needed to...

  4. LCRO 217/2017 PY v SD [pdf, 395 KB]

    ...complaint against him. [33] The Committee warned Mr SD to be “more cognisant in the future of the importance of independence”, and recommended that he “review other powers of attorney made by his firm”. Application for review [34] Mrs PY filed an application for review on 17 November 2017. She disagrees with both the approach taken and the conclusion reached by the Committee. At the hearing, she refuted that she was the type of person described by Mr SD in his response...

  5. [2020] NZEmpC 43 A Labour Inspector v Matangi Berry Farm Ltd [pdf, 423 KB]

    A LABOUR INSPECTOR v MATANGI BERRY FARM LIMITED [2020] NZEmpC 43 [16 April 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2020] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 7/2018 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN A LABOUR INSPECTOR Plaintiff AND MATANGI BERRY FARM LIMITED First Defendant AND JIUBO JIANG Second Def

  6. Nelson Standards Committee v Grey [2023] NZLCDT 33 (4 August 2023) [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...emerging causes, often taking on the Government or institutions. Donations to this fund are encouraged by a small team of supporters and held in a separate account "legal fund" (not connected to Sue) as required by law and used to pay court fees or assist in expenses bringing these issues to light. Funds are only released on submission of approved legal invoices. Sue's work and funding in the past has been used on issues such as the 5g legal challenge, aerial broadcast of...

  7. RIA: AML/CFT Expiring Regulations [pdf, 422 KB]

    Impact Statement Template | 1 Coversheet: AML/CFT Expiring Regulations Advising agencies Ministry of Justice Decision sought This analysis has been prepared to inform Cabinet decisions regarding new Anti-money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regulations and substantial policy changes to the existing AML/CFT regulations Proposing Ministers Minister of Justice Summary: Problem and Proposed Approach Problem Definition What problem or op

  8. [2021] NZEnvC 175 Shaw v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    1 SHAW v HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 175 IN THE MATTER of objections under Section 23 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN MURRAY NELSON SHAW AND MARGARET EVELYN SHAW (ENV-2019-AKL-000316) Objectors AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Commissioner J A Hodges Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at

  9. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 33 [pdf, 298 KB]

    ...cladding cracks were apparent at Page | 7 the time of the first assessor’s report more widespread cracking has occurred since then. PROCEDURAL ISSUES [14] This claim was originally heard in the Tribunal in June 2009. An appeal was filed against the determination and the High Court referred the matter back to the Tribunal to be reheard. A case conference was convened to set a timetable for the re-hearing and the parties agreed that even if a new adjudicator was...

  10. Who is vulnerable or hard-to-reach in the provision of maternity, Well Child and early parenting support services? [pdf, 467 KB]

    WORKING DOCUMENT NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Who is vulnerable or hard-to-reach in the provision of maternity, Well Child and early parenting support services? Addressing the Drivers of Crime: Maternity and Early Parenting Support 30 June 2010 WORKING DOCUMENT 2 NOT GOVERNMENT POLICY Maternity and Early Parenting Support Who is vulnerable or hard-to-reach in the provision of maternity, Well Child and early parenting support