Search Results

1. [2022] NZIACDT 8 - IF v Registrar (2 May 2022) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...appellant and his wife that day informing them of this and asking her to stop working immediately if she was doing so. He stated that a s 61 application would have to be filed as soon as possible.1 [12] On 1 July 2021, the adviser filed a s 61 request. In his letter of explanation to Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ), the adviser admitted his error. [13] By this stage, the appellant was in direct communication with Immigration NZ. A visa officer informed him on 2 July 2...

2. Judicial-Appointments-Protocol-HC-February-2025 [docx, 86 KB]

   ...according to the law, and which will be aware of, and sensitive to, the broad dimensions of our society. Recognising the importance of this task and the public interest in the appointments processes, the procedures for judicial appointments have been formalised. The guiding principles for the procedures are as follows: Clear and publicly identified processes for selection and appointment; Clear and publicly identified criteria against which persons considered are assessed; Clear and publicly...

3. Wild v Ministry for Primary Industries (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...Privacy Commissioner’s investigation of Ms Wild’s complaint regarding her information privacy request of 22 March 2020 was limited to IPP 6. There is no evidence that suggests the Commissioner’s investigation included the subsequent privacy requests by Ms Wild to MPI, which were made from December 2020.11 The Privacy Commissioner’s Certificate of Investigation is dated 23 December 2020 and thus it is improbable that Ms Wild’s subsequent requests were included within that...

4. DB & NB v R Ltd & D Ltd [2024] NZDT 439 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...contract for carriage evidenced by their airline tickets, but that the airlines’ baggage rules for extra baggage are not part of this contract. 5. In the alternative, they argue that the contract relating to the baggage was amended, supplemented or formed on 28 February 2023 during an in-person visit to the airport. As a result, they are claiming for: • The difference between $NZD150 and $USD200 for five pieces of baggage CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 6 • The excess...

5. Standard Terms and Conditions

   ...for interpreters. See more information about the Quality Framework here.  Recipient means a person whose communications are being interpreted from one language to English (or another language accepted by the court) by an Interpreter for an Event. Request means a written request made by the Ministry for Interpreter Services that seeks details from You regarding, for example, your availability and fees.  Note: A Request is solely for the information of the Ministry and is not an offer o...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Service providers >
   4. Interpreting in courts & tribunals

6. Dennison v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late review, extenuating circumstances) [2025] NZACC 177 [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...assessed WPI of 30% less 11% that was subject to a previous lump sum compensation payment). The decision noted Mr Dennison was eligible for a top-up payment to account for the increase from 18-19%. [13] On 9 March 2024 Mr Dennison completed an ACC33 form requesting a review of the 2009 decision to reduce his WPI from 74% to 18%. When explaining why he was unable to apply earlier, Mr Dennison stated that he was not made aware of the review form at the time. [14] In a detailed writt...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 58 Goodfellow v Building Connexion Ltd [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...TRADING AS ITM BUILDING CENTRE NZEmpC CHCH 3 June 2011 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2011] NZEmpC 58 CRC 28/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF a request to have a judgment recalled BETWEEN GREGORY MARK GOODFELLOW Plaintiff AND BUILDING CONNEXION LIMITED TRADING AS ITM BUILDING CENTRE Defendant Hearing: on the papers - memoranda received 10 February 2011 and 29 A...

8. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 54 (14 May 2015) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...DECISION This Complaint [1] This decision imposes sanctions, following a decision upholding a complaint against Mr Hakaoro (E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29; see www.justice.govt.nz). [2] Mr Hakaoro accepted instructions to assist the complainant with a request for a visa, she was in New Zealand unlawfully as she did not hold a visa. Mr Hakaoro: [2.1] Knew his client’s circumstances, she did not have a job offer or New Zealand partner. [2.2] He considered it would be advantageous if...

9. AV v ZE [2014] NZDT 668 (8 October 2014) [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...of Student Fees Refunds, Trust Account.” Is AV bound by the 20 consecutive missed days rule? [9] AV’s enrolment in the course is a contract between her and the school. It is governed by the ordinary rules of contract law. A contract is formed when two people have a meeting of the minds. One person makes an offer of what the contract is to be and the other accepts. It often happens that one party is not fully aware of all of the detailed terms of a contract they have accept...

10. BORA Smoke-Free Environments (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Amendment Bill [pdf, 294 KB]

    ...that which has been in place in Australia since December 2012. The broad purpose of the Bill is to improve public health in New Zealand by reducing smoking prevalence. The Act, or regulations made under the Act, already ban or restrict almost all forms of tobacco-related promotion and advertising in New Zealand. CONSISTENCY WITH FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION Section 14 – Freedom of expression 4.Section 14 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to freedom of express...