Search Results

1. FVPP09 Safety programme sessions completion report [docx, 271 KB]

   Safety Programme Sessions Completion Report -FVPP09 Safety programmes provided under the Family Violence Act 2018 Please submit this form when safety programme sessions have been completed. If there was any change made to the programme after submitting the FVPP08 please outline these changes in the relevant section below. Noting that any change to the programme type should have occurred within 2-3 sessions and any extension would be a maximum of 5 additional sessions. Client name:...

2. Find out if you have a fine or check your balance

   To find out if you have a fine or to check your balance, you can call us on: 0800 4 FINES (0800 434 637, free from NZ mobile) From overseas: +64 4 915 8586 From Australia: 1800 144 239 (toll free) Our hours are 8.00am - 7.00pm, Monday - Friday. You can pay a fine online, over the phone, from overseas, or in person. All fines need to be paid within 28 days. Ways to pay a fine.  

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments

3. Give documents to court and parties to the case

   File documents at court You file documents at court when you give the court your application documents or when you respond to someone else’s application. Check with us if you’re not sure which forms and documents you need to file. Make sure your forms are signed and dated before you file them at the court. Forms filled in on screen must be printed out before being signed and filed. Some applications don’t charge a fee. If there’s a fee to file your application, you need to pay it when yo...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Prepare for court

4. Director of Proceedings v Pasifika Integrated Healthcare Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...staff were to complete NZQA Level 3 and 4 certificates in the Care of the Older Person. The defendant had not undertaken any disability services focussed training and did not have an NZQA qualification. According to Mr F’s Worker Competency Form, Mr F had “7 years [e]xperience in care of disability. On the job training, orientation & supervision by experience[d] [service co-ordinator].” The defendant’s policies 17. The defendant’s policy “Support Worker Taking Se...

5. FR v US LCRO 249 / 2010 (17 November 2011) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...if he isn‟t going to like it) before some real harm comes to him”. This email refers to copies of “legal documents or confidential 3 documents” being sent to her office box number which the Applicant states the Practitioner had requested him to send her. The Applicant states in his complaint that he did not do so because he had concerns “after a couple more emails from her... [that] she would not be able to separate her legal and friendship hats”. [10] Matters...

6. VK & VI v AC LCRO 268-269 / 2011 & 105 / 2012 (13 May 2013) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...on 19 March 2010 in which he sought confirmation from Mr AC that the issues relating to Mrs VI were sub judice, and that the Board was unable to discuss the matter with him for this reason. [17] He sent another email to Mr AC on 24 March, again requesting confirmation that the matter was sub judice. [18] Mr AC responded on that date by advising that the person who was referred to as “TA” in Mr VK’s emails had not been identified and that as a result Mr AC could not answer...

7. Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...assessor’s report and the repairs section, 15.6.2 and say the repairs are to modify design faults which should not be attributed to any installation by Harvey Roofing. There are no moisture readings showing water ingress through any of the flashings. Information indicates ingress of water via the cladding and window flashings and the unflashed parapet. Therefore, AHI say that there was no defect in the workmanship of Harvey Roofing. 23. The assessor has recommended, in relation to...

8. ENV-2016-AKL-000271 Bunnings Limited v Auckland Transport [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...proposed road widening would fail to achieve Auckland Transport's objectives. (b) There is no basis for Designation 1453 to apply to the New Lynn Site as the land for which the predecessor road widening requirement was previously acquired now forms part of the road, and Auckland Transport has been unable to provide any evidence to demonstrate that the road widening designation was modified during the rollover process or inserted into the plan through a notice of requirement or si...

9. HES v Parekh [2019] NZIACDT 36 (29 May 2019 [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...they did not satisfy the requirements for a culturally arranged marriage. It was noted that it had been declared on the form that the couple had spent 18 months living together, when in fact they had not met. [12] On 13 April 2016, Ms Parekh requested Immigration New Zealand to review the decline decision. She stated that the application was on the basis of a culturally arranged marriage. The couple had “yet to meet together”. The officer was asked how the couple were supp...

10. RDA v Registrar of Immigration Advisers [2020] NZIACDT 4 (24 January 2020) [pdf, 122 KB]

    ...dispute process. [20] A dispute also arose between the appellant and the adviser as to when the former terminated the latter’s instructions to represent him on the immigration application. [21] On about 25 February 2019, the appellant orally requested a refund from the adviser for the immigration services that had been paid for but not undertaken. He ceased working for the adviser about two days later. [22] According to the appellant, a fee refund was refused by the adviser on...