19735 items matching your search terms
Directory of Official Information Listings M-O Author Version number Date About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspondenc
...purposes that: (a) all parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order; and 9 (b) all parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court’s endorsement fall within the Court’s jurisdiction and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the Act, including in particular, Part 2. [27] Therefore, on the information provided to the Court, I am satisfied that the orders will promote the purpose of the Act. Order [28] The Court...
...employer to do any work for hire or reward under a contract of service; and (b) includes— (i) a homeworker; or (ii) a person intending to work; but (c) excludes a volunteer who— (i) does not expect to be rewarded for work to be performed as a volunteer; and (ii) receives no reward for work performed as a volunteer. (2) In deciding for the purposes of subsection (1)(a) whether a person is employed by another person under a contract of service, the court or the Autho...
...that the Respondent had acted at all 5 times in her client’s best interests, and that the Applicant and his wife knew the options available to them before they committed to the assignment of the lease on extended terms. [23] Having formed this view the Standards Committee resolved to take no further action pursuant to s152(2)(c) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. [24] The Applicant has applied for a review of that decision and refers to specific paragraphs in the...
...The Tribunal set aside the decision. The Adviser had established he took appropriate steps to file the submissions, and reasonably believed the Tribunal had acknowledged receipt. http://www.iaa.govt.nz/ 3 [13] The Adviser’s submissions requested an oral hearing, and set out a response to the complaint. The Tribunal determined the Adviser should have the opportunity of presenting his case at an oral hearing. [14] The parties were informed the procedure at the hearing would ref...
...about aspects of IK’s representation of her. The complaint alleged: • A failure by Mr IK to hold fees she had paid in advance, in a trust account (the trust account complaint). • A failure by Mr IK to provide engagement and client care information (the terms of engagement complaint). • A failure by Mr IK promptly to invoice Ms VR (the invoice complaint). • A failure by Mr IK to return documents to Ms VR following termination of the retainer (the documents complaint). [2...
...that he did not protect Ms Berry’s interests when making arrangements to insure the property. 7) That Mr Rondel was in breach of Rules 7 and 7.1 in failing to report to Ms Berry following completion of the transaction. [3] In that decision, I requested that the parties provide submissions as to penalty orders and publication, which both parties have now done. Mr Rondel is now represented by Mr AK who has been appointed by Mr Rondel’s insurer. [4] Prior to reconvening the hear...
...interview, they had received ongoing advice and information about the applications from unlicensed staff in the Philippines. Seven of them had also advised that they did not have formal service contracts with Mr Cleland. [26] The Authority requested from Mr Cleland the full files of those 11 clients. The files were duly provided. [27] On 13 July 2017, Immigration New Zealand subsequently referred to the Authority another client of Mr Cleland whose job offer was false.7 Mr Cle...
...view, s 156(1)(h)(i) which empowers a Standards Committee, and this Office on review, to order a lawyer “to rectify, at [the lawyer’s] own expense, any error or omission” is the more appropriate authority. [99] Mr QT’s error was in requesting Ms UF to pay the invoice in circumstances where she was not responsible for payment. Decision [100] For the above reasons pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Act, the 16 June penalty determination of the Standards Committee is: (a)...
...[6] On 11 October 2015, Ms Franklin advised Mrs Dowson by email that Mr Sijo Thomas wanted to make a cash offer. Mr Thomas was a licensed salesperson engaged at a different branch of the Agency. On 14 October 2015, the Dowsons signed a “Form 2” consent form, giving consent to the sale of the property to a “related person”. [7] On 18 October 2015, the Dowsons and Mr Thomas signed an agreement for sale and purchase of the property, for a purchase price of $900,000. Settle...