Search Results

Search results for forms.

19940 items matching your search terms

  1. Maruera v Te Runanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Trust (2017) 378 Aotea MB 118 (378 AOT 118) [pdf, 389 KB]

    ...polls or hui convened for tribal purposes. Mr McErlane, for the Rūnanga, opposes the application and says that it is the Crown who have recognised the mandate of his client to act as agent for a post settlement governance entity that may be formed at some time in the future with the consent of the iwi. The purpose of that entity, he says, will then be to enter into a Deed of Settlement with the Crown to resolve all the tribe’s historical claims, if the iwi ratifies any such set...

  2. Brown v Otago Polytechnic and Progressive Enterprises (Recusal Application) [2014] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 82 KB]

    ...making unfavourable decisions. Mr. Haines adjudication of my complaints amounts to transparent violations of my Civil Rights and the Crimes Act, and therefore it is only fitting that Mr. Haines stand down as adjudicator of my complaints. Mr Brown requested to give particulars of his complaint [11] As it was not clear whether this letter was a complaint in relation to the Otago Polytechnic proceedings (HRRT003/13) or those against Progressive Enterprises Ltd (HRRT004/13) or both, the...

  3. AE v Decision to prosecute LCRO 93/2013 & 338/2013 (11 March 2014) [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...entering into the agreement had retired and was then based in [the UK]. [9] She advised that she required the services of a lawyer because her ex husband wanted to have a record of the payments that he was about to make pursuant to the agreement and requested Mr AE to send her his “retainer procedure”.6 [10] Mr AE did not know Ms GR and he advises that her enquiry probably arose through his website. [11] Mr AE responded and requested Ms GR to provide her physical address. H...

  4. E29 Urban Design and Landscape Architecture JWS [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...these are temporary maritime-industrial and event buildings. A combination of fit-for- purpose techniques shall be used comprising a-d and at least three of e-j: a. expression of primary and secondary building volumes with modulation of height or form; b. roof form modulation; c. provision of human scale, fine-grained detail and richness at all edges that the public will view at close range, and larger forms and elements to respond to mid and long-range viewing distances; d. vis...

  5. [2017] NZEmpC 66 Lal v The Warehouse [pdf, 136 KB]

    ...being fit for some work subject to some physical restrictions (relating to prolonged sitting, standing and walking). 1 Lal v The Warehouse Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 78. [7] Ms Lal requested a meeting with Ms Wooding (Human Resources) in late September 2013. At the meeting Ms Lal expressed a desire to transfer to a different store to undertake her rehabilitation. She said that her manager was not providing her with lig...

  6. [2021] NZREADT 12 - Walker v The Real Estate Agents Authority & Hickson (26 March 2021) [pdf, 276 KB]

    ...that the deposit was to be paid to the appellants’ ASB account, not the Westpac account, and to ensure that the deposit was paid into the correct account. The Committee’s penalty decision [11] The Committee recorded that the appellants had requested a full refund of the commission charged by Mr Hickson ($23,718.75), and compensation of $45,000, being the difference between the purchase price paid and what the appellants claimed the purchaser would have paid had Mr Hickso...

  7. Te Korowai Tiaki o Te Hauāuru Incorporated Society v Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Tama Trust (2019) 407 Aotea MB 47 (407 AOT 47) [pdf, 319 KB]

    ...registration 6 See, for example, Taueki v Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust – Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block 920160 347 Aotea MB 269 (347 AOT 269) at [17]. 407 Aotea MB 52 application forms that were sent to the PO Box during that period were “returned to sender”; (c) some voting packs for the recent trustee election process were not received by registered beneficiaries; (d) some beneficiaries who wished to register a...

  8. 2020-09-18-EPA-PC1-PC8-Summary-of-Submissions-Report-UPDATED.pdf [pdf, 685 KB]

    .................................................................................................................. 2 3.3 Position on the plan change expressed in submissions ............................................................................. 2 3.4 Request to be heard ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3.5 Provisions submitted on .......................................................

  9. Karena v Whitfield - Omahu 4C Section 6 [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 170 (2018 APPEAL 170) [pdf, 302 KB]

    ...on 7 April 2017 in the Māori Land Court registry in Hastings. This is within the 2 month time period set out in s 58(3) of the Act. The appeal was rejected by the Deputy Registrar on the basis that it should have been filed in the prescribed form at the Māori Appellate Court registry in Wellington. Unfortunately, Mr Karena did not become aware of the Deputy Registrar’s decision until 19 May 2017, and only as a result of contacting the Court to request an

  10. OIA-97445.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 22 August 2022 Our ref: OIA 97745 Dear Official Information Act request: Moana House applications, Proceeds of Crime Fund Thank you for your email of 20 July 2022 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information relating to the Moana House applications. Specifically you requested: I would...