Search Results

1. What happens next

   ...the tribunal. The purpose of the hearing is for the tribunal to hear arguments from both sides so it can make a decision. You’re responsible for making sure you have prepared your case and your witnesses are ready for the hearing. Hearings are formal, held in a courtroom, and are open to the public. A case can also be heard on the papers which means you will not need to appear in a courtroom but requires all parties to agree to this process. Decisions The tribunal can make a decision und...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Copyright >
   3. Licensing scheme disputes

2. Arranging for witnesses to give evidence

   ...person at least 24 hours before the witness must be at the hearing, or you can post it to the witness as a registered letter at least 10 days before the witness must be at the hearing. Paying the witness an appropriate fee and allowance As the person requesting the witness to attend the hearing, you’re liable to pay them a witness fee, allowance and travel expenses. To find out how much you’re liable to pay, see: Witnesses and Interpreters Fees Regulations 1974 What happens if the witness i...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. What happens next

3. Apply for a review

   ...the tribunal, you must do so within 20 working days of the Commissioner’s review decision.   In exceptional circumstances, you can ask the tribunal to give you an extension when you apply for a review. There’s a space in the application form for you to explain why the tribunal should consider your application even if it’s late. You must file your late application no later than 3 months after the date of the Commissioner’s review decision. What you need to send us To apply to t...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Legal aid >
   3. Legal Aid Tribunal

4. HIJ v RST and UVW (Publication) [2013] NZHRRT 41 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...proving one of the exceptions in Principle 11, the Tribunal must then determine whether the disclosure constituted an interference with the individual’s privacy as defined in s 66 of the Privacy Act. That is, has the plaintiff established one of the forms of actual or potential harm contemplated by s 66(1)(b). The burden of proof reverts to the plaintiff at this stage. [74.4] Fourth, if the Tribunal is satisfied to this stage, then its final task is to determine whether, in its disc...

5. Planning (dated 22-26 May 2017) [pdf, 762 KB]

   ...site over the existing road formation, albeit with some upgrading of works within legal road reserve. 22. We agree that for the transport truck to travel to the subject site, the vehicle will traverse over Mr Mursa’s property which functions as formed road. We recognise the road formation is long established and that historically all vehicles on the formed road will traverse the property of Mr Mursa. We agree that any issues of access while using the formed road are a civil matter....

6. LCRO 203/2017 HI v JK (6 August 2020) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...engage a lawyer. He was provided with contact details for Mr JK and duly arranged to meet with Mr JK. Mr JK was unable to keep that appointment. An arrangement was made that he meet Mr JK at court on the morning of 29 March 2016. [5] Mr JK made request of Mr HI to bring $1,500 to court, this to cover initial fees. [6] Mr JK says that he terminated the retainer. Mr HI disputes this. He contends that Mr JK failed to turn up at court when his application to avoid being disqualifie...

7. LCRO 194/2017 MA v NB, OC and PD (20 September 2019) [pdf, 344 KB]

   ...diametrically opposed to another lawyer’s view and, absent incompetence, it is not always possible to determine which view is the better. [118] Again, absent incompetence, tactical and strategic advice given by lawyers to their clients will be informed by that lawyer’s experience as well as their assessment of the other party’s position. It is, in many respects, a battle of wits and wills. [45] In Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Castles, the Lawyer’s Disciplinary Tribunal no...

8. OIA-118546.pdf [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 16 May 2025 Ref: OIA 118546 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Ministerial Advisory Group for Retail Crime Thank you for your email of 20 December 2024 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), requesting information about Sunny Kaushal and the Ministerial Advisory Group for Retail Crime (the MAG), under the Official I...

9. [2010] NZEmpC 108 MacBeth v Cookie Time Limited [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...This should be in the form of a list of appropriately described categories of documents. Those lists are to be provided within 14 days after the provision of further particulars by the plaintiff. [6] Each party is to respond to the other party’s request for discovery by providing a list of documents in the form commonly used in High Court civil proceedings. I note that the range of documents potentially relevant to the matters at issue in this proceeding may include documents held by...

10. [2015] NZSSAA 98 (11 December 2015) [pdf, 32 KB]

    ...lump sum had been paid to her as a result of not claiming for the United Kingdom pension from age 60. The lump sum payment was also paid into the Special Banking Option account on 15 April 2014. The appellant contacted the Ministry about this and requested that the money be paid into her personal bank account. The amount of the lump sum was £553.89 or NZ$1,066.49. [6] The Chief Executive made a decision to deduct the amount of the lump sum payment from one fortnightly payment of New...