3994 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 23 Reference No. HRRT 058/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN MICHAEL TAI RAKENA PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr M Tai Rakena in person Ms V McCall and Ms G Taylor for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 19 June 2017 MINUTE OF CH...
...statutory scheme, as opposed to the way in which the sections should be interpreted. Any change in policy is for Parliament. The points raised by Ms Hennessy cannot be remedied by a decision of this Court. [19] Ms Hennessy took her case to the Human Rights Review Tribunal which issued a declaration that s 71A and its equivalent provision in s 198 of the 2018 Act are inconsistent with the right to freedom from discrimination affirmed by s 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 199...
...edition), maintained by the Legislation Design and Advisory Committee (LDAC). s9(2)(h) RE LE AS ED B Y TH E MIN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E I N C O N F I D E N C E 4 The rights and freedoms contained in the Bill of Rights Act and the Human Rights Act 1993 20 The Bill is consistent with the Bill of Rights Act and the Human Rights Act. Advice has been provided to the Attorney-General by the Crown Law Office on consistency with the Bill of Rights Act. Consultation 21 N...
...relating to the Convention 6 Communications procedures Article 14 of CERD 6 Article 14 Ratification of other instruments UNDRIP and other international treaties Article 1 of CERD 7 NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 Article 2 of CERD 8 New Zealand Human Rights Commission and Human Rights Act Article 2 of CERD 8 Te Tiriti o Waitangi Article 2 of CERD 8-9 Te Arawhiti Article 2 of CERD 10 https://ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx Te Puni Kōkiri Article 2 of CERD 10...
...September 2019. Ms Muir alleges that Mr Zhou breached Information Privacy Principles 1, 2, 3 and 4 in secretly looking at, or recording, Ms Muir and her friends. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Muir v Zhou (Strike Out) [2022] NZHRRT 49.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 49 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] While the statement of claim was served on Mr Zhou, he has never participated in any aspect of this claim. [3] Likewise, Ms Muir is now not taki...
...generally fit for all the purposes for which goods of the type in question are commonly supplied. I consider that in this case the relevant question is whether given the extent of the ant infestation, was the caravan supplied by T Ltd to FQ fit for human habitation, and in particular, was it fit for human habitation by a family with young children. 6. FQ says from the first day opening the caravan doors there were dead ants and cockroaches throughout it. She says when she first tol...
Humans, rather than computers, review and decide on almost all significant decisions made by government agencies. As agencies continue to develop new algorithms, it’s important to preserve appropriate human oversight and ensure that the views of key stakeholders, notably the people who will receive or participate in services, are given appropriate consideration. The Algorithm Charter is a commitment by government agencies to manage their use of algorithms in a fair, ethical and transparent way...
...organisations within relevant statutory rules. • maintain mine infrastructure and manage ongoing mine safety while work on re-entry is undertaken • seal the mine and rehabilitate the site once work on re-entry is complete and no further human activity in the drift is required; the sealing of the mine will meet all relevant safety standards and would be a reversible seal (a seal that allows for the mine to be re-entered at a future date) Structure The Agency is headed by...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND WAIHŌPAI RŪNAKA, TE RŪNANGA O ŌRAK
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND WAIHŌPAI RŪNAKA, TE RŪNANGA O ŌRAKA APAR