[2021] NZEmpC 139 QDA v EKD [pdf, 336 KB]
...That day she discussed the incident with colleagues. It was agreed that because Mr D appeared to have been involved in a “driver-at-fault” incident while on a final warning, a disciplinary meeting should take place. With the assistance of Human Resources (HR), she began preparing a letter on that topic, although she did not give it to Mr D until he returned to work on 4 July 2018. [40] Mr S denied either receipt of the incident form on 3 July 2018 or that he spoke to Mr D...