Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 189 H v A Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...interviewing them. On the same day, aware that a complaint was being lodged, Mr H prepared a summary of the events which he submitted to management later in the process. [30] Mr Pearce met first with Ms H on 23 August 2013. Ms R Chapman, a Human Resources Consultant, also attended and took a note of the questions asked and answers given. The same process was adopted with regards to all witnesses other than Mr H as will be explained more fully below. [31] On the same day, Mr P...

2. Gibbs v Te Runanga o Ngati Tama - Part Lot 2 and Lot 1 DP 4866 (TNK 4/901) and Section 1 SO 10359 CT TNK4/792 (2011) 274 Aotea MB 47 (274 AOT 47) [pdf, 370 KB]

   GIBBS V TE RUNANGA O NGATI TAMA MLC 274 Aotea MB 47 [26 October 2011] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 274 Aotea MB 47 (274 AOT 47) A20040005718 A20070011279 UNDER Section 338(2), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 2 & Lot 1 DP 4866 (TNK 4/901) and Section 1 SO 10359 CT TNK 4/792 BETWEEN RUSSELL GIBBS AND PARANI GIBBS Applicants AND TE RUNANGA O NGATI TAMA First Respondent AND NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCI

3. Burke Family Trust v Wellington City Council [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...look beyond the strict legality of ownership and to allow a claim where strict ownership is vested in another party (a company). 5.11 In Berry v Lay & Ors (WHRS claim 136 – 11/3/05) the adjudicator said: "Individual trustees are human beings who may own and occupy, or own and lease, the dwelling. They are the persons who will suffer as a result of the defects in the construction and will often suffer distress, anxiety, inconvenience or trauma that may go with the pro...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 025 Minister of Corrections v Otorohanga District Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [20181 NZEnvC 25 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a direct referral pursuant to s 87G of the Act MINISTER OF CORRECTIONS (ENV-2017-AKL-92) Applicant OTOROHANGA DISTRICT COUNCIL Consent Authority Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner ACE Leijnen Environment Commissioner R Bartlett Environment Commissioner G Paine Hearing : I

5. [2017] NZEnvC 174 New Zealand Transport Agency v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...in the proposed commercial use. I start by considering the recently adopted "Safe System" approach. Safe System approach [86] The court received evidence on the philosophy of the "Safe System" approach which is to recognise human error and vulnerability are inevitable, even for responsible road users, and to take this into account by designing a more forgiving road system'"' That was promoted in New Zealand's Road Safety Strategy 2010-2020, pu...

6. Recommendations Recap Issue 18 [pdf, 736 KB]

   ...person is above the legal limit. That is only conclusion that can properly be drawn from the research that has been conducted in this area. Researchers have noted:12 Hauptman M, Bronstein AC (1987) Lack of Observable Intoxication in Humans With High Plasma Alcoholic Concentrations. J Forensic Sci 32:1660–1665. 10 Olsen et al Relationship Between Blood Alcohol Concentration and Observable Symptoms of Intoxication in Patients Presenting to an Emergency Department (2013...

7. Standards of Care 2018 [pdf, 450 KB]

   STANDARDS OF CARE FOR WOMEN REQUESTING ABORTION IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND Report of a Standards Committee to the Abortion Supervisory Committee January 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. II  GLOSSARY OF MĀORI TERMS ..........................................................................................................

8. LCRO 75/2017, 210/2017 and 212/2017 SW v HB (31 October 2018) [pdf, 425 KB]

   LCRO 75/2017 210/2017 212/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SW Applicant and Respondent AND HB Respondent and Applicant The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms SW and Ms HB, both of whom are lawyers, applied for

9. 6_WK-response-to-District-Councils-request-for-information-under-section-92-Final-v2.pdf [pdf, 5.2 MB]

       Level 5, The Majestic Centre 100 Willis Street PO Box 5084 Wellington 6011 New Zealand T 64 4 894 5200 F 64 4 894 3305 www.nzta.govt.nz     Tēnā tātou, Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project- – Response to request for additional information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 This letter provides a response to the request for further information pursuant to section 92 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (“RM

10. 21.-Evidence-of-Mr-Michael-Smith-Noise-and-Vibration.PDF [PDF, 1.4 MB]

    ...overall noise levels.15 For locations where the existing environment primarily consists of natural sounds, the amenity effects will often result as much from the change in character as from the change in level. 39. Factors that influence the human response to noise include non-acoustic factors such as an individual’s sensitivity to noise, underlying health conditions, prior exposure to noisy environments, relationship with the noise source and expectations in general. 15...