3317 items matching your search terms
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 479 APPLICANT TU FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT EN C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim against EN in relation to the retaining wall is dismissed. (The claim in relation to the ensuite has been settled via payment by C Ltd of $5703.53 on 14 May 2024). Reasons 1. TU engaged NI Ltd trading as NQ (removed from the Companies
...the posts were simply screwed to the new retaining wall and not properly supported. 11. He says he discussed his concerns with SE but they could not agree on a way forward and because of this, XL contracted another builder to rebuild parts of the job and complete what was left as per XL’s expectations. 12. In addition to the fence, there was also a disagreement in relation to the timing of placement of a coil matt. 13. SE says he completed the work as agreed and submits that...
...jurisdiction with a disability should be the subject of a non-publication order. I also did not take her to be suggesting that a potential employer should not be told of a person’s particular health issues, to the extent they are relevant to the job. In this particular situation, however, she notes that the plaintiff’s disability is an “invisible” one and submits the plaintiff should be able to maintain control over how and when information is disclosed. [20] I acknowle...
...that. 13. I find that there is insufficient evidence to establish misleading or deceptive conduct. That is because CX could not remember when he had been notified of his suspension and therefore whether he know of it at the time he accepted ND’s job. CX said that even before his suspension he was withdrawing from the certification role because of an increased workload. If there has been a breach, what remedy is appropriate? 14. Where there has been a breach of a guarantee und...
...the public and that “..when left to his own devices is noncompliant...”. These comments were said to be sufficiently fresh to justify very close scrutiny of Mr Gartrell’s proposed practise arrangements. [24] Mr Gartrell has obtained a job offer with a large group of companies for whom he had acted some 20 years prior to his suspension. His immediate superior, a Director of the company, Mr M, gave evidence of his expectation of working relatively closely with Mr Gartrel...
...raised by the defendant. Content of an affidavit An affidavit should contain all the written evidence that you want to present. It should be written in the first person (for example, ‘I saw…’, ‘he said to me…’), and must state the full name, job and home address of the person making it. It must cover only matters that would be allowed if you were giving evidence at a trial and, if it is an affidavit in reply, it must be strictly in reply. If the affidavit includes unnecessary mater...
...increased between 2009 (68%) and 2014 (73%). There was no statistically significant change in the ratings for juries from 2009 or 2006. There was no statistically significant change in the percentage of adults who rated judges as doing an excellent or good job between 2014 and 2009, but there was an increase between 2006 (47%) and 2014 (50%). The percentage of adults who rated criminal lawyers as excellent or good increased between 2009 (42%) and 2014 (47%). The percentage of adults who rated p...
...plan that focuses on giving Oliver a chance to break the cycle of reoffending. When Oliver leaves prison, he'll face the challenge of returning to normal life. His sentence plan may aim to help with this by including topics like budgeting, getting a job and handling relationships. The plan aims to give the best kind of help for Oliver's needs. Because Oliver smoked a joint before the crash happened it also includes an alcohol and drug rehabilitation programme. Generally, the longer a person is...
...both in the form of written reports, technical data and of photographs, as well as the above-mentioned oral evidence from SF. I will not attempt to repeat or summarise all of this evidence in this order. I note that this was clearly a complicated job, where the [vehicle] engine had been mounted ‘east west’ and the replacement engine from a [vehicle] had been mounted ‘north south’ in that vehicle. The use of that engine therefore required extensive and time-consuming fabrication of...
...of the Fair Trading Act 1986, or section 19(1)(e) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. In order to make a finding that a charge is harsh or unconscionable I need to be satisfied that the agreed price is so far in excess of a reasonable range for the job as to be outrageous. I have considered all the evidence available in this claim and am unable to make a finding of this nature. 15. I accept D Ltd’s evidence that although the work was completed in one day, it had two LBP’s plus ot...