Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 24 Tradefog Global Co Ltd v Bartholomeusz [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...employer. That issue did not materialise until the Authority received closing submissions from Tradefog Global at the end of the investigation meeting after evidence had been heard. [4] According to the determination, Mr Bartholomeusz was offered a job as a salesperson on 19 June 2015. An individual employment agreement with Tradefog International’s name on it was signed that day by Mr Bartholomeusz. On 17 September 2015 Mr Bartholomeusz’s employment was terminated by letter,...

2. Applicant C v Registrar of Real Estate Agents Authority 2017] NZREADT 10 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...decisions have had a seriously adverse impact on her employees. We are concerned at the applicant’s response to a question from Ms Lawson-Bradshaw regarding the impact on her employees. That response was that the employees appreciated that they had jobs and, while they were still annoyed that the KiwiSaver contributions had not been paid, they trusted her to do so (we understand, by way of the reparation order). [34] In its assessment of whether the applicant should now be gran...

3. LCRO 264/2016 YQ v VG [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...fully with those concerns. Mr VG was not a party to the employment relationship, so there is no contractual privity. Unlike 10 employer and employee, Mr VG had no enforceable legal rights or obligations under the employment agreement. His job was to provide advice based on the facts, which the employer was not obliged to follow. Suggesting that he suspended Ms YQ conflates his legal capacity with that of his client, and completely misconceives his role as a lawyer. [41] Th...

4. Unnikrishnan v Goldsmith [2017] NZIACDT 22 (29 September 2017) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...responsibilities for caring for a family member with special needs; [13.4] her own health was poor; [13.5] she had ceased to work as a licensed immigration advisor and was not planning to do so again; [13.6] she had “no income coming from a job”, and little prospects of obtaining employment; [13.7] she had a debt to Inland Revenue of $101,913.91; [13.8] she had no financial means to compensate anybody and considered that the extent of what she could offer was a “sincere...

5. LCRO 199/2015 PA v TD and RN (25 July 2018) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...lawyers’ primary obligations were to the Court. Their obligations to Mrs OL and Mrs BE were subject to that. Any obligations the lawyers may have owed to Mr PA fall behind those obligations and must be viewed from the perspective that the lawyers’ job was to advance their clients’ interests, although not without constraint. [41] As Mr PA says, r 2.3 constrains lawyers to use legal processes only for proper purposes, and prohibits the use of the law and legal processes to cau...

6. [2021] NZIACDT 9 - SL v Mackintosh (5 May 2021) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...why she went to Ms Mackintosh in July 2018, nine months before the expiry of her visa. If she had known of Immigration New Zealand’s decision in September 2018, she would have had six months before the visa expired to upskill and find a new job. But this opportunity was lost. [23] While Ms Mackintosh had some technical problems, she did not bother to call and get an update on the complainant’s application. A genuine effort was not made by her. Throughout the nine months, t...

7. Pepere - Tikitiki A23 (2001) 61 Ruatōria MB 150 (61 RUA 150) [pdf, 688 KB]

   ...on the exercise of my discretion beyond those outlined in section 133(3)/93 are to be found in section 2/93, the Preamble and section 17/93. Through section 2193 and consistent with section 5 of the Interpretation Act 1999, it is this Court's job to interpret the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 in a manner that best furthers the principles set out in the Preamble of Act and to exercise the powers, duties and discretions granted to the Court in a manner that facilitates an...

8. Cooper v Corrections [2019] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...anticipate the result of that contact. [13] Mr Cooper also made an unscheduled visit to the Papakura Service Centre on the same date where he voiced his displeasure that his employer had been contacted by his probation officer leading him to lose his job, and advising he wished to complain about this. [14] On 4 March 2014, Mr Cooper again visited the Mangere Service Centre where he saw Mr Tiatia and complained about the contacting of his employer. [15] On 10 March 2014, Mr Coop...

9. Strengthening the family justice system - EasyRead - Word version [docx, 10 MB]

   ...[image: ][image: ]I am a lawyer for a child [image: ]I am a lawyer for adults [image: ] [image: ]I am a Counsellor [image: ]I work for the family court [image: ]I work as something else for the family justice service. [image: ] Please say what your job is in the family justice service: Thank you [image: ] Thank you for taking the time to read and answer questions about the March 2019 changes to the family justice system. [image: ] Your feedback is important to us....

10. [2021] NZIACDT 6 - TB v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (22 March 2021) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...appellant wanted to discuss other options for residence. They had meetings in person on 15 February and 9 March. He requested her to look for a level 7 online course, so that he would be eligible for residence. They also discussed finding a job outside Auckland which would attract bonus points. He asked her to recheck his work experience in Sri Lanka for additional points. He asked whether he could apply for a talent visa. [23] The adviser said that it was not until 12 March...