Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 47 TLNZ Auckland Ltd and C3 Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ and Parsloe & Ors and Jennings & 21 ors [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...Third Defendants Hearing: 7 March 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Peter Chemis and Joss Opie, counsel for plaintiffs Simon Mitchell and Kishen Kommu, counsel for first and second defendants No appearance for third defendants Judgment: 13 March 2012 REASONS FOR ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] These are my reasons for declining the interim injunctive relief sought by the plaintiffs in my oral judgment issued 7 March 2012. 1...

2. Tukapua v Taueki - Horowhenua Block 11 (2012) 278 Aotea MB 172 (278 AOT 172) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...(Lake Horowhenua) BETWEEN BRENTON TUKAPUA Applicant AND PHILLIP TAUEKI Respondent Hearing: 278 Aotea MB 24, dated 16 January 2012 (Heard at Levin) Appearances: Brenton Tukapua in person Phillip Taueki in person Judgment: 31 January 2012 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE LR HARVEY Introduction [1] On 25 August 2011 Chief Judge Isaac ordered the Registrar to convene a meeting of beneficiaries of Lake Horowhenua Trust for the purpose of electing an ad...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 129 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 7 MB]

   ...Forest and Bird , dated 11 June 2018, at [5]. Cancer Society of New Zealand Inc v Ministry of Health [2013] NZHC 2538, [2013] NZAR 1461 , Rodney Hansen J. 10 the cost of certainty. The use of Guidetines to promote a consistent approach to the judgments enforcement officers are called upon to make is entirely proper provided they do not introduce extraneous considerations which have the effect of unlawfully fettering the exercise of the decisionmaking power. However well intentio...

4. E74 Dr Malcolm Patterson - EIC - Ngāti Whātua Orākei [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...Auckland. 1851. Auckland Public Library. 1984. 2286 [10] Fortune, G. and Dr G. Young. (Transcription of) Orakei Minutes of the Native Land Court. The Marutuahu Confederation and Hauraki Maori Trust Board. 2005. [11] Fenton, F.D. Important Judgements. Southern Reprints. 1994. [12] Williams, H.W. Dictionary of the Maori Language (7th ed.). GP Publications Ltd. Wellington. 1992. [13] Simmons, D. Maori Auckland. The Bush Press. Auckland . 1987. [14] Great Britain P...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 029 Waimea Plains Landscape Preservation Society Inc v Gore District Council [pdf, 438 KB]

   ...EIC, Appendix 1. 35 Which is a reference to the draft of that document dated May 2021. 36 Y Pflüger, EIC, Appendix 1. 37 Y Pflüger, EIC, Appendix 1. 38 Y Pflüger, EIC, Appendix 1. 22 Such an assessment “relies on a landscape architect’s judgement in respect of visual amenity and the reaction of people who may be affected by the proposal”.39 [85] It states that “this should also recognise that people more susceptible to change generally include: residents at home; peop...

6. Julian v Inia - Succession to Moehuarahi Te Ruuri (2024) 309 Waiariki MB 197 (309 WAR 197) [pdf, 459 KB]

   ...definition of tikanga: The word ‘tikanga’ itself provides the clue that tikanga Māori deals with right and wrong. ‘Tika’ means ‘to be right’ and thus tikanga Māori focuses on the correct way of doing something. This involves moral judgements about appropriate ways of behaving and acting in everday life. 309 Waiariki MB 210 [56] Both moral duties and tikanga evolve as society evolves. This natural evolution is acknowledged by the FPA, by leaving it to the courts t...

7. Austin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 180 [pdf, 634 KB]

   ...ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN LESLEY NORMAN AUSTIN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Mr G J Thwaite for the Applicant Ms L Hansen for the Respondent Judgment: 7 November 2023 _____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J MCGUIRE [Leave to appeal to the High Court Section 162(1) Accident Compensation Act 2001] ______________...

8. LCRO 81/2018 QQ v RR (26 November 2019) [pdf, 548 KB]

   ...31 January 2019. Mrs RR was represented by Mr TT. For the reasons that follow, the Committee’s determination has been reversed on review, as a result the orders fall away. This Office will take no further action. 2 Background The judgment of Judge AP Walsh dated [Date] neatly encapsulates the background that brought Mrs and Mr RR to court.1 Mrs RR was represented by Mr QQ and Mr YY as counsel. Judge Walsh’s decision records that Mrs and Mr RR lived and owned proper...

9. Transcript (weeks 7 & 8 Dunedin) [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal pursuant to s Of the notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) of The Resource Management Act 1991 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 17 May 2021 held in Courtroom Dunedin Co

10. Transcript (weeks 7 & 8 Dunedin) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal pursuant to s Of the notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) of The Resource Management Act 1991 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 17 May 2021 held in Courtroom Dunedin Co