Search Results

1. Director of Proceedings v Taranaki District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 613 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL Reference No. HRRT 012/2021 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND TARANAKI DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Deputy Chairperson Ms BL Klippel, Member Dr SJ Hickey MNZM,

2. LCRO 103/2021 & LCRO 58/2022, LCRO 104/2021 and LCRO 105/2021 GS v ABC Ltd & HY, [Law Firm A] v ABC Ltd & HY and SW v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (24 November 2022) [pdf, 595 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 126 Ref: LCRO 103/2021 LCRO 058/2022 LCRO 104/2021 LCRO 105/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GS Applicant AND AND BETWEEN AND AND BETWEEN AND ABC LTD and HY Responden

3. [2021] NZEmpC 217 Humphreys v Humphreys and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Health [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...June and 13 August 2021 and further submissions filed on 9, 15 and 20 September 2021 Appearances: P Cranney, counsel for plaintiff L Meys as litigation guardian for first defendant S McKechnie and T Bremner, counsel for second defendant Judgment: 8 December 2021 JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS Introduction [1] Sian Humphreys is a 33-year-old woman. She was diagnosed with Angelman syndrome when she was three years old. She has been assessed as having...

4. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

5. Maori Trustee v Hanford - Ohiro 19 and 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) (2006) 165 Aotea MB 131 (165 AOT 131) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   Minute Book: 165 AOT 131 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: Counsel: Judgment: Introduction A20050012905 A20050012904 UNDER Sections 135 and 310 ofTe Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ohiro 19 & 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) BETWEEN MAORI TRUSTEE Applicant AND 21, 22, 23 November 2005 (Heard at Wellington) STEPHEN HANFORD RUSSELL RODGERS Respondents Mr G Shaw and Mr H Wilson for the Applicant Mr T Bennion and Ms C Castle...

6. ENVC Matiatia transcript 20141006 [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...reasons just mentioned. 1220 Then, “Moreover,” is the next paragraph, “the question of… under section 104.” THE COURT: JUDGE NEWHOOK Sounds to me as though it might come perilously close to the discussion of the broad overall judgment of the Supreme Court decision in King Salmon or EDS. So we might actually be driving higher than the Court of Appeal in terms of our consideration of these issues as to whether holistic or not, Mr Brabant. MR R BRABANT:...

7. CAC 10064 v Jin [2013] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...now facing the blame for trying to use my best efforts to help two of my friends. 28. This complaint against me only came from Ms Kim after her lawyers, Fortune Manning, had used up all other options without success. I understand they also got a judgment against Mr Choi, but found out that there is no money left and that he had run away. 9 29. I feel this complaint has been motivated by a desire for money, instead of a genuine belief that I had done anything wrong.” The...

8. Hawke v ACC [2013] NZACA 5 [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...BETWEEN DIANE HAWKE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 February 2013 at Auckland Authority: Robyn Bedford Counsel: P Schmidt for appellant; CJ Hlavac for respondent Judgement: 15 April 2013 JURISDICTION RULING AND DIRECTIONS FOR THE SUBSTANTIVE APPEAL [1] The respondent seeks leave pursuant to s 111 of the Accident Compensation Act 1982, to appeal to the High Court from the ruling of the Authority...

9. JR v SW LCRO 91/2014 (27 March 2015) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...the Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) on review is to reach his own view of the evidence before him. Where the review is of an exercise of discretion, it is appropriate for the LCRO to exercise particular caution before substituting his own judgement for that of the Standards Committee, without good reason.3 The Hearing [17] Both parties were represented at the hearing which took place on 14 November 2014. Mr LB appeared for JR and Mr SW appeared in person. Analysis [18...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 097 Handley v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

    ..."is worded as a pre-condition to 'stages' of the work being carried out".5 In support of that submission, the appellant relies on the High Court decision in Westfield6 It is helpful to refer to the relevant passages from the judgment of Fisher J in full : [59J Of course it would be different if it could be postulated that consents could not be given to certain permitted activities without the imposition of invalid conditions. But I can see no reason for assuming...